Cited by 49Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Prominent ears in children younger than 4 years of age: what is the appropriate timing for otoplasty?

Gosain, Arun K., Kumar, Ajay, Huang, George·2004·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine whether otoplasty performed in children younger than 4 years of age has an acceptable long-term outcome. This two-part study consisted of (1) a questionnaire mailed to 481 members of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons to ask their opinion on the timing of otoplasty, and (2) a consecutive series of 12 patients who had otoplasty performed before the age of 4 years. The survey demonstrated that the majority (57 percent) of the respondents perform otoplasty on patients who are aged 5 years or older. The prospective series consisted of 12 patients ranging in age from 9 months to 3 years at the time of the procedure. Otoplasty was bilateral in nine patients and unilateral in three patients. Length of follow-up ranged from 21 months to 7(1/2) years, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Growth following otoplasty was evaluated in three patients who underwent unilateral otoplasty by measuring the length of both ears at the time of final follow-up. No difference in ear length was noted between the sides that were and were not operated on during a follow-up period of 46 to 63 months. Noticeable recurrence was noted in only one (8 percent) of 12 patients. In response to a follow-up questionnaire to the patients' families, all respondents (n = 10) stated that if again asked to choose the timing of otoplasty in their children, they would opt to have it performed at the same age of younger than 4 years. Otoplasty can be safely performed at ages younger than previously thought without interfering with growth of the operated ear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.prs.0000135334.13796.9d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gosain, A. K., Kumar, A., & Huang, G.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2004-10
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
1042-1054
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006350571
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Association of Plastic Surgeons
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, pediatric otoplasty, timing of surgery, children under 4 years, ear growth, recurrence, long-term outcomes, surgeon survey
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Reoperation, Time Factors, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review