Cited by 23Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty.

Gualdi, Alessandro, Cambiaso-Daniel, Janos, Gatti, Jonatann, Wurzer, Paul, Sljivich, Michaela, Scherer, Saja S., Pietramaggiori, Giorgio, Bertossi, Dario +2 more·2018·Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prominent ears have a negative impact on patients' psychosocial well-being. There are numerous surgical correction techniques described, but the majority have high complication and recurrence rates. In this article, the authors present a stitchless technique that takes advantage of different approaches to minimize complications and recurrences. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied patients who underwent a bilateral double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty in an outpatient setting. This prominent ear setback technique is based on a specific cartilage excision to mechanically collapse the ear without using any sutures through the cartilage. Postoperatively, surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The patient-reported outcome was analyzed after completion of a questionnaire 6 months after surgery, and another clinical follow-up appointment was arranged 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients (120 ears) with an average age of 24 years were studied, and the overall complication rate was 6 percent. Three ears (2.5 percent) developed superficial cutaneous necrosis at the anterior concha, and one ear (1 percent) required an additional correction for unsatisfactory pinna rotation. Also, 2.5 percent of the patients experienced a grade I complication, and 1 percent of the patients experienced a grade IIIa complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. No wound infections, hematomas, or hypertrophic scars were observed, and the patient-reported outcome showed satisfaction with the results. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings show that the double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty is a safe procedure with low complication/recurrence rates. This stitchless technique should be included in each surgeon's repertoire as an alternative to previously published surgical techniques. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000004175

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gualdi, A., Cambiaso-Daniel, J., Gatti, J., Wurzer, P., Sljivich, M., Scherer, S. S., Pietramaggiori, G., Bertossi, D., Botti, C., & Botti, G.
Affiliations
University of Verona (IT)
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2018-03
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
348e-356e
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790795114
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, prominent ears, cartilage excision, surgical complications, recurrence, patient-reported outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ear Cartilage, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Suture Techniques, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review