Double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prominent ears have a negative impact on patients' psychosocial well-being. There are numerous surgical correction techniques described, but the majority have high complication and recurrence rates. In this article, the authors present a stitchless technique that takes advantage of different approaches to minimize complications and recurrences. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied patients who underwent a bilateral double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty in an outpatient setting. This prominent ear setback technique is based on a specific cartilage excision to mechanically collapse the ear without using any sutures through the cartilage. Postoperatively, surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The patient-reported outcome was analyzed after completion of a questionnaire 6 months after surgery, and another clinical follow-up appointment was arranged 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients (120 ears) with an average age of 24 years were studied, and the overall complication rate was 6 percent. Three ears (2.5 percent) developed superficial cutaneous necrosis at the anterior concha, and one ear (1 percent) required an additional correction for unsatisfactory pinna rotation. Also, 2.5 percent of the patients experienced a grade I complication, and 1 percent of the patients experienced a grade IIIa complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. No wound infections, hematomas, or hypertrophic scars were observed, and the patient-reported outcome showed satisfaction with the results. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings show that the double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty is a safe procedure with low complication/recurrence rates. This stitchless technique should be included in each surgeon's repertoire as an alternative to previously published surgical techniques. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale, a validated tool for assessing surgical complications that has been used to assess postoperative complications of otoplasty.
“Any complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. 31 This is a validated tool for assessing surgical complications, and has been used to assess postoperative complications of otoplasty. 32,33”
Cites
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378 · see citing works
A “NATURAL” TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS
STENSTRÖM, S. J. (1963) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196311000-00003 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
A TECHNIQUE FOR SURGICAL CORRECTION OF LOP EARS
Converse, J. M., Nigro, A., WILSON, F. A., & JOHNSON, N. (1955) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-195505000-00004 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
The Treatment of Prominent Ears by Buried Mattress Sutures: A Ten-Year Survey
MUSTARDÉE, J. C. (1967) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196704000-00008 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Janis, J. E., Rohrich, R. J., & Gutowski, K. A. (2005) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000156218.93855.c9 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Complications of otoplasty: a literature review.
Limandjaja, G. C., Breugem, C. C., Mink van der Molen, A. B., & Kon, M. (2009) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.043 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Otoplasty: Evaluation, Technique, and Review
Kelley, P., Hollier, L., & Stal, S. (2003) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/00001665-200309000-00008 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.
Horlock, N., Misra, A., & Gault, D. T. (2001) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00005 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies.
Janz, B. A., Cole, P., Hollier, L. H., & Stal, S. (2009) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aa0e9d · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods
Tan, K. H. (1986) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(86)90100-1 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Psychosocial Effects of Otoplasty in Children with Prominent Ears
Gasques, J. Á. L., de Godoy, J. M. P., & Cruz, E. M. T. N. (2008) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-008-9179-x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Correction of Prominent Ears Using Buried Mattress Sutures
Mustardé, J. C. (1978) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)32150-7 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Gosain, A. K., Kumar, A., & Huang, G. (2004) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000135334.13796.9d · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007) · Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.otc.2006.11.006 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Otoplasty: Sequencing the Operation for Improved Results
Hoehn, J. G., & Ashruf, S. (2005) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000146680.27906.90 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kompatscher, P., Schuler, C., Clemens, S., Seifert, B., & Beer, G. M. (2003) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-003-3062-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Cihandide, E., Kayiran, O., Aydin, E. E., & Uzunismail, A. (2016) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000002607 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Posterior scoring of the scapha as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty
Hassanpour, S. E., & Moosavizadeh, S. M. (2008) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.07.040 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gualdi, A., Cambiaso‐Daniel, J., Gatti, J., et al. (2016) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-016-0745-3 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationPercutaneous Adjustable Closed Otoplasty for Prominent Ear Deformity
Özturan, O., Doğan, R., Eren, S. B., Aksoy, F., & Veyseller, B. (2013) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e31827ff103 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Komplikationen der Ohrmuschelanlegeplastik und ihre Behandlung
Weerda, H., & Siegert, R. (1994) · Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie · doi:10.1055/s-2007-997160 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Becker, D. G., Lai, S. S., Wise, J. B., & Steiger, J. D. (2006) · Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2006.01.008 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Taboada‐Suárez, A., Brea‐García, B., Couto‐González, I., & Vila‐Moriente, J. L. (2014) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599814551541 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Özturan, O., Doğan, R., Eren, S. B., Aksoy, F., & Veyseller, B. (2014) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000000828 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Safety approach to otoplasty: a surgical algorithm.
Haubner, F., Kuehnel, T., Gassner, H., & Nunes, D. (2015) · Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555629 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dynamometric analysis of normative auricular stiffness and comparison with operated prominent ears.
Ozturan, O., Dogan, R., Ozucer, B., Yildirim, Y. S., & Meric, A. (2015) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000002062 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aesthetic Otoplasty: Principles, Techniques and an Integrated Approach to Patient-Centric Outcomes
Ordon, A., Wolfswinkel, E., Shauly, O., & Gould, D. J. (2019) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-019-01441-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Complications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alanazi, H. (2024) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000009976 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Bulstrode, N. W., Ronde, E. M., & Mazeed, A. S. (2024) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000011342 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Minimally invasive technique for correction of prominent ear
Teaima, A. A., Hasaballah, M. S., & Mady, O. M. (2020) · The Journal of International Advanced Otology · doi:10.5152/iao.2020.7942 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The availability of various techniques suggests that there is no single globally accepted and ideal procedure [3, 4].”
Background
- Authors
- Gualdi, A., Cambiaso-Daniel, J., Gatti, J., Wurzer, P., Sljivich, M., Scherer, S. S., Pietramaggiori, G., Bertossi, D., Botti, C., & Botti, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Venue
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 348e-356e
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790795114
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, prominent ears, cartilage excision, surgical complications, recurrence, patient-reported outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Ear Cartilage, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Suture Techniques, Patient Satisfaction, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review