The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery are increasingly important for clinical research endeavors. Traditional surgical outcomes, centered on morbidity and mortality, remain important but are no longer sufficient on their own. Quality of life has become a crucial research topic augmenting traditional concerns focused on complications and survival. Given this, reliable and valid patient questionnaires are essential for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgeons. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature review to identify patient-reported outcome measures developed and validated for use in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery patients. Qualifying instruments were assessed for adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation. RESULTS: The authors identified 227 health outcomes questionnaires used in breast surgery studies. After 135 generic instruments, 65 ad hoc instruments, seven oncologic instruments, 11 education questionnaires, and two non-English-language questionnaires were excluded, seven measures remained. Detailed analysis revealed that six of the seven measures had undergone limited development and validation. Only one measure, the Breast-Related Symptoms Questionnaire, demonstrated adequate development and validation in its target population. It had, nevertheless, significant content limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery are lacking. To demonstrate the benefits of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, future research to rigorously develop and validate new cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery-specific instruments is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales
Wallston, K. A., Strudler Wallston, B., & DeVellis, R. (1978) · Health Education Monographs · doi:10.1177/109019817800600107 · Cited by 3,373
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 · Cited by 1,752
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., Franzini, L., Williams, A., de Haes, H. C., Hopwood, P., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2756 · Cited by 1,220
A body image scale for use with cancer patients
Hopwood, P., Fletcher, I., Lee, A., & Al Ghazal, S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00353-1 · Cited by 984
Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale
Watson, M., Greer, S., Young, J., Inayat, Q., Burgess, C., & Robertson, B. (1988) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700002026 · Cited by 666
The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory
Cash, T. F., Melnyk, S. E., & Hrabosky, J. I. (2004) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10264 · Cited by 577
Cash, T. F., Santos, M. T., & Williams, E. F. (2005) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.07.008 · Cited by 348
Long-term follow-up of breast cancer survivors with post-mastectomy pain syndrome
Macdonald, L., Bruce, J., Scott, N. W., Smith, W. C. S., & Chambers, W. A. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602304 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Hu, E. S., Pusic, A. L., Waljee, J. F., Kuhn, L., Hawley, S. T., Wilkins, E., & Alderman, A. K. (2009) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ab10b2 · Cited by 302
Self-citationDevelopment and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scale
Pusic, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., & Cano, S. J. (2013) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001 · Cited by 253
Self-citationPatient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim
Doward, L. C., Gnanasakthy, A., & Baker, M. G. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-89 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Pusic, A. L., Chen, C. M., Cano, S., Klassen, A., McCarthy, C., Collins, E. D., & Cordeiro, P. G.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 823-837
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148264995
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81
- The paper
- Pusic, A. L., Chen, C. M., Cano, S., Klassen, A., McCarthy, C., Collins, E. D., & Cordeiro, P. G. (2007). Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.