Cited by 577Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory

Cash, Thomas F., Melnyk, Susan E., Hrabosky, Joshua I.·2004·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The Appearance Schemas Inventory (ASI) is a 14‐item instrument that assesses body image investment in relation to certain beliefs or assumptions about the importance, meaning, and influence of appearance in one's life. Despite empirical support of the ASI, critical examination evinces several limitations of this assessment. These problems entail the inclusion of explicitly self‐evaluative items and social stereotypes, few behavioral items, and a repeated failure to find expected gender differences on the ASI. Method: We initially constructed a 45‐item measure (40 new items plus 5 original items) and administered it, along with the original ASI and other validational assessments, to 603 college students (468 women and 135 men). Results: The end result was a 20‐item revision of the inventory (ASI‐R), which included two factors: Self‐Evaluative Salience and Motivational Salience. For both genders, the composite ASI‐R and its two factors had high internal consistency and were significantly convergent with other pertinent measures of body image and psychosocial functioning. The ASI‐R and its two subscales showed significant gender differences, whereas the original ASI did not. We also examined racial differences on the ASI‐R, its correlations with body mass, and its unique contribution to the prediction of disturbed eating attitudes. Discussion: We offer this measure as an improved, psychometrically sound replacement for the ASI. © 2004 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 35: 305–316, 2004.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.10264

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cash, T. F., Melnyk, S. E., & Hrabosky, J. I.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Cash, Thomas F.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-22
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
305-316
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2111386815
Cited by
577
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 26
FWCI
18.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
appearance schemas, instrument revision, motivational salience, gender differences, racial differences, body mass, university students, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review