Cited by 203Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Effects of Perceived Racism and Anger Inhibition on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in African Americans

Steffen, Patrick R., McNeilly, Maya, Anderson, Norman, Sherwood, Andrew·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective Hypertension is more prevalent in African Americans compared with Americans of European descent. Preliminary evidence indicates that perceived racism may play a role in elevated blood pressure in African Americans. The present study examined whether perceived racism was associated with higher ambulatory blood pressure measured during daily life. A potential contributing role for anger inhibition was also evaluated. Methods Twenty-four-hour ABP was obtained from 69 African American men and women with normal or mildly elevated blood pressure. ABP was averaged over waking and sleep periods, and clinic BP was also assessed. Perceived racism and anger expression were measured using self-report questionnaires. Results Greater perceived racism was related to higher ABP during waking hours for SBP (p Conclusions Perceived racism and anger inhibition are independently related to higher ABP. Both may contribute to the incidence of hypertension and hypertensive-related diseases observed in African Americans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000079380.95903.78

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional inhibition in African American women has been linked to higher sleep diastolic blood pressure and smaller day-to-night drops in DBP.

    “Emotional inhibition in African American women has been associated with higher sleep diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and smaller drops in DBP from day to night (Steffen, McNeilly, Anderson, & Sherwood, 2003).”

    From Superwoman Schema: African American Women’s Views on Stress, Strength, and Health (2010) · cites this paper as Steffen, McNeilly, Anderson, & Sherwood, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steffen, P. R., McNeilly, M., Anderson, N., & Sherwood, A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-09
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
746-750
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976784692
Cited by
203
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
37.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL49427, R01HL049427)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
perceived racism, ambulatory blood pressure, African Americans, hypertension, racial discrimination, anger expression, sleep blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, racial disparities in health
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Culture, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, North Carolina, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Expressed Emotion, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review