Cited by 15Anesthesia and Pain ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine infiltrative analgesia in otoplasty.

Abstract

In Brief A prospective double-blind study was conducted to compare the anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in a bilaterally symmetrical otoplasty model. Because ropivacaine has a significantly lower toxic potential than bupivacaine, it may be established as the anesthetic agent of choice for low-dose infiltration anesthesia in routine aesthetic facial operations. Each of the 24 adult patients undergoing bilateral otoplasty received infiltration with ropivacaine in 1 auricle and an equal volume of bupivacaine in the other. Patients were requested to assess their pain separately in each side at the times of infiltration, during cartilage scoring, and 2, 6, and 10 hours postoperatively on a visual analog scale. Intraoperative success rates were similar, and overall analgesia achieved at 2 hours, 6 hours, and 10 hours postoperatively was not found to be statistically different between ropivacaine and bupivacaine. The authors conclude that ropivacaine can be used as an effective alternative to bupivacaine in otoplasty. In a double-blind study of 24 adult bilateral otoplasties, infiltration anesthesia was achieved with ropivacaine in one ear and bupivacaine in the other. There was no difference in pain perception intraoperatively or at 2, 6, and 10 hours postoperatively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sap.0000151460.74629.b2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In bilateral cases, bupivacaine and ropivacaine had similar analgesic efficacy.

    “In bilateral cases, Kakagia et al20 found similar analgesic efficacy for bupivacaine and ropivacaine but highlighted ropivacaine’s lower cardiotoxicity, making it preferable in high-risk patients.20”
  • Ropivacaine has lower cardiotoxicity than bupivacaine, making it preferable in high-risk patients.

    “In bilateral cases, Kakagia et al20 found similar analgesic efficacy for bupivacaine and ropivacaine but highlighted ropivacaine’s lower cardiotoxicity, making it preferable in high-risk patients.20”
  • Lidocaine-based local infiltration provides useful intraoperative analgesia, yet is consistently inferior to regional nerve block at 6-12 hours postoperatively.

    “The present synthesis also clarifies that lidocaine-based local infiltration (1% with adrenaline 1:200,000) provides useful intraoperative analgesia, yet is consistently inferior to RNB at 6–12 hours postoperatively—an interval in which bupivacaine RNB still confers sensory blockade, opioid-sparing, and higher comfort scores.20”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Scott, 1989, Anesth Analg, 69, 563
  2. Petterson, 1999, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 24, 569
  3. O??Donoghue, 1999, Acta Chir Plast, 41, 103
  4. Hernandez???Palazon, 200, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 48, 17

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kakagia, D., Fotiadis, S., & Tripsiannis, G.
Affiliations
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Corresponding author
Kakagia, Despoina
Venue
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2005-04
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
409-411
ISSN
0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044515233
Cited by
15
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
ropivacaine, bupivacaine, otoplasty, local infiltration anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, local anesthetic efficacy, auricle, pain perception, facial aesthetic surgery
MeSH terms
Ropivacaine, Adult, Amides, Anesthetics, Local, Bupivacaine, Double-Blind Method, Ear, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review