The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Prospective Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly acknowledged surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually performed as an open surgery procedure, although now some groups perform it via the laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and January 2002 we conducted a randomized prospective study in 104 patients diagnosed with morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group with gastric bypass via the open approach (OGBP) comprising 51 patients, and 1 group with gastric bypass via the laparoscopic approach (LGBP) comprising 53 patients. The parameters compared were as follows: operating time, intraoperative complications, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) postoperative complications, hospital stay, and short-term evolution of body mass index. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 186.4 minutes (125-290) in the LGBP group and 201.7 minutes (129-310) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 8% of the LGBP patients. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) occurred in 22.6% of the LGBP group compared with 29.4% of the OGBP group, with no significant differences. Late complications (>30 days) occurred in 11% of the LGBP group compared with 24% of the OGBP group (P < 0.05). The differences observed between the 2 groups are the result of a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias in the OGBP group. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (1-13) in the LGBP group and 7.9 days (2-28) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Evolution of body mass index during a mean follow-up of 23 months was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LGBP is a good surgical technique for the management of morbid obesity and has clear advantages over OGBP, such as a reduction in abdominal wall complications and a shorter hospital stay. The midterm weight loss is similar with both techniques. One inconvenience is that LGBP has a more complex learning curve than other advanced laparoscopic techniques, which may be associated with an increase in postoperative complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity
Panel, C. D. C. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956 · Cited by 2,163
Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
Schauer, P. R., Ikramuddin, S., Gourash, W., Ramanathan, R., & Luketich, J. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200010000-00007 · Cited by 1,327
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Costs
Nguyen, N. T., Goldman, C., Rosenquist, C. J., Arango, A., Cole, C. J., Lee, S. J., & Wolfe, B. M. (2001) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200109000-00002 · Cited by 1,055
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary Report of Five Cases
Wittgrove, A. C., Clark, G. W., & Tremblay, L. J. (1994) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089294765558331 · Cited by 870
Complications of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 1,040 Patients - What Have We Learned?
Higa, K. D., Boone, K. B., & Ho, T. (2000) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089200321593706 · Cited by 603
Ren, C. J., Patterson, E., & Gagner, M. (2000) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089200321593715 · Cited by 600
SUGERMAN, H. J., STARKEY, J. V., & BIRKENHAUER, R. (1987) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198706000-00002 · Cited by 534
NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel.
(1991) · PubMed · Cited by 496
Gastric Bypass Operation for Obesity
Fobi, M. A. L., Lee, H., Holness, R., & Cabinda, D. (1998) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s002689900496 · Cited by 353
Gastric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: The Adelaide Study
HALL, J. C., WATTS, J. M., OʼBRIEN, P. E., DUNSTAN, R. E., WALSH, J. F., SLAVOTINEK, A. H., & ELMSLIE, R. G. (1990) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199004000-00007 · Cited by 311
Cited by
Picot, J., Jones, J., Colquitt, J., Gospodarevskaya, E., Loveman, E., Baxter, L., & Clegg, A. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13410 · Cited by 1,066
Stenberg, E., dos Reis Falcão, L. F., O'Kane, M., Liem, R., Pournaras, D. J., Salminen, P., Urman, R. D., Wadhwa, A., Gustafsson, U. O., & Thorell, A. (2022) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9 · Cited by 494
Obesity surgery: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
Sauerland, S., Angrisani, L., Belachew, M., Chevallier, J. M., Favretti, F., Finer, N., Fingerhut, A., Garcia Caballero, M., Guisado Macias, J. A., Mittermair, R., et al. (2005) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9194-1 · Cited by 420
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
Himpens, J. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.45 · Cited by 403
Olbers, T., Bj??rkman, S., Lindroos, A., Maleckas, A., L??nn, L., Sj??str??m, L., & L??nroth, H. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000218085.25902.f8 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Luján, J. A., Frutos, M. D., Hernández, Q., Liron, R., Cuenca, J. R., Valero, G., & Parrilla, P.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 239
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 433-437
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065874088
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 33.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000120071.75691.1f
- The paper
- Luján, J. A., Frutos, M. D., Hernández, Q., Liron, R., Cuenca, J. R., Valero, G., & Parrilla, P. (2004). Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Prospective Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000120071.75691.1f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.