The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Five-Year Survival After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in Patients Screened by Positron Emission Tomography With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the first 5-year overall survival results in patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver who have undergone hepatic resection after staging with [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The 5-year overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases without preoperative FDG-PET has been established in 19 studies (6070 patients). The median 5-year overall survival rate in these studies is 30% and has not improved over time. FDG-PET detects unsuspected tumor in 25% of patients considered to have resectable hepatic metastasis by conventional staging. METHODS: From March 1995 to June 2002, all patients having hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases had preoperative FDG-PET. A prospective database was maintained. RESULTS: One hundred patients (56 men, 44 women) were studied. Metastases were synchronous in 52, single in 63, unilateral in 78, and <5 cm in diameter in 60. Resections were major (>3 segments) in 75 and resection margins were > or = 1 cm in 52. Median follow up was 31 months, with 12 actual greater than 5-year survivors. There was 1 postoperative death. The actuarial 5-year overall survival was 58% (95% confidence interval, 46-72%). Primary tumor grade was the only prognostic variable significantly correlated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Screening by FDG-PET is associated with excellent postresection 5-year overall survival for patients undergoing resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. FDG-PET appears to define a new cohort of patients in whom tumor grade is a very important prognostic variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taylor, A., Primrose, Langeberg, W., Kelsh, Mowat, F., Alexander, D., Choti, M., Poston, G., & Kanas, G. (2012) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s34285 · Cited by 657
Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases
Zorzi, D., Laurent, A., Pawlik, T. M., Lauwers, G. Y., Vauthey, J.-N., & Abdalla, E. K. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5719 · Cited by 532
House, M. G., Ito, H., Gönen, M., Fong, Y., Allen, P. J., DeMatteo, R. P., Brennan, M. F., Blumgart, L. H., Jarnagin, W. R., & D'Angelica, M. I. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.040 · Cited by 517
Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Garden, O. J. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2006.098053 · Cited by 417
Colorectal cancer: Metastases to a single organ
Vatandoust, S. (2015) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11767 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandez, F. G., Drebin, J. A., Linehan, D. C., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., & Strasberg, S. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-450
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046715471
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five-Year Survival After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in Patients Screened by Positron Emission Tomography With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000138076.72547.b1
- The paper
- Fernandez, F. G., Drebin, J. A., Linehan, D. C., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., & Strasberg, S. M. (2004). Five-Year Survival After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in Patients Screened by Positron Emission Tomography With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000138076.72547.b1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.