The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Open accessAbstract
There has been increasing recognition of the potential benefits of liver resection for colorectal metastases in the UK although this treatment has been established more widely in other Western countries. There are no randomised studies assessing outcome following resection compared with no treatment or other therapeutic modalities in patients with known resectable liver metastases as it is generally considered unethical not to offer surgery for resectable disease. There has been increased interest in more aggressive chemotherapy regimens that have been reported to not only control metastatic disease but also to render some advanced liver metastases resectable.1–4 Furthermore, other new modalities have become available that allow safe ablation of liver metastases without the need for surgical intervention. There is therefore a need to produce clear guidelines on the appropriate management of patients with colorectal cancer who have been shown to have hepatic metastases. These guidelines are intended to address a number of issues: 1. the principles under which patients with hepatic metastases should be managed; 2. which patients who have undergone attempted curative resection of the primary colorectal tumour should be offered surveillance; 3. what investigations are required to determine appropriate management; and 4. which treatment modality is most appropriate in a given clinical context. The process of formulating any clinical guidelines requires a guideline development group, a search strategy with review of the relevant literature, synthesis of evidence (and consensus methods for topics when evidence is lacking), followed by external review. A multidisciplinary meeting with representation from a number of interested bodies involving surgeons, gastroenterologists, oncologists, diagnostic and interventional radiologists, pathologists, general practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and patients was held in the Pelican Centre in Basingstoke on 2–4 October 2003 (see appendix 1). The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to provide a framework for assessing …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Twaddle, S., & Qureshi, S. (2005) · Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.ehbc.2005.09.008 · Cited by 4,084
Fong, Y., Fortner, J., Sun, R. L., Brennan, M. F., & Blumgart, L. H. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199909000-00004 · Cited by 3,715
Douillard, J., Cunningham, D., Roth, A., Navarro, M., James, R., Karasek, P., Jandik, P., Iveson, T., Carmichael, J., Alakl, M., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02034-1 · Cited by 3,256
Tournigand, C., André, T., Achille, E., Lledo, G., Flesh, M., Mery-Mignard, D., Quinaux, E., Couteau, C., Buyse, M., Ganem, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.05.113 · Cited by 2,915
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Scheele, J., Stang, R., Altendorf‐Hofmann, A., & Paul, M. (1995) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf00316981 · Cited by 1,539
Giacchetti, S., Perpoint, B., Zidani, R., Le Bail, N., Faggiuolo, R., Focan, C., Chollet, P., Llory, J. F., Letourneau, Y., Coudert, B., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.1.136 · Cited by 1,403
Competing interests: none declared.
Hirsch, L. (2006) · Cited by 1,396
Liver resection for colorectal metastases.
Fong, Y., Cohen, A. M., Fortner, J. G., Enker, W. E., Turnbull, A. D., Coit, D. G., Marrero, A. M., Prasad, M., Blumgart, L. H., & Brennan, M. F. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.938 · Cited by 1,284
Pawlik, T. M., Scoggins, C. R., Zorzi, D., Abdalla, E. K., Andres, A., Eng, C., Curley, S. A., Loyer, E. M., Muratore, A., Mentha, G., et al. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000160703.75808.7d · Cited by 1,101
Resection of Nonresectable Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Bismuth, H., Adam, R., Lévi, F., Farabos, C., Waechter, F., Castaing, D., Majno, P., & Engerran, L. (1996) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199610000-00009 · Cited by 963
Cited by
Taylor, A., Primrose, Langeberg, W., Kelsh, Mowat, F., Alexander, D., Choti, M., Poston, G., & Kanas, G. (2012) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s34285 · Cited by 657
Intraoperative Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Balog, J., Sasi-Szabó, L., Kinross, J., Lewis, M. R., Muirhead, L. J., Veselkov, K., Mirnezami, R., Dezső, B., Damjanovich, L., Darzi, A., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005623 · Cited by 608
Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer: A Challenge for Personalized Medicine?
Molinari, C., Marisi, G., Passardi, A., Matteucci, L., De Maio, G., & Ulivi, P. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19123733 · Cited by 262
Survival improvement for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over twenty years
Zeineddine, F. A., Zeineddine, M. A., Yousef, A., Gu, Y., Chowdhury, S., Dasari, A., Huey, R. W., Johnson, B., Kee, B., Lee, M. S., et al. (2023) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00353-4 · Cited by 192
Leto, S. M., & Trusolino, L. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00109-014-1161-2 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Garden, O. J.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- suppl_3
- Pages
- iii1-iii8
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164799457
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2006.098053
- The paper
- Garden, O. J. (2006). Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.098053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
