The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To evaluate the role of force feedback with applications to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Two research hypotheses were tested using our automated laparoscopic grasper. Summary Background Data: Conventional laparoscopic tools do not have the ability of providing force feedback to a surgeon when in use with or without robotic surgical systems. Loss of haptic (force and tactile) feedback in MIS procedures is a disadvantage to surgeons since they are conventionally used to palpating tissues to diagnose tissues as normal or abnormal. Therefore, the need exists to incorporate force feedback into laparoscopic tools. Methods: We have developed an automated laparoscopic grasper with force feedback capability to help surgeons differentiate tissue stiffness through a haptic interface device. We tested our system with 20 human subjects (10 surgeons and 10 nonsurgeons) using our grasper to evaluate the role of force feedback to characterize tissues and answer 2 research hypotheses. Results: Our experiments confirmed 1 of our 2 research hypotheses, namely, providing both vision and force feedback leads to better tissue characterization than only vision feedback or only force feedback. Conclusions: We have validated 1 of our 2 research hypotheses regarding incorporating force feedback with vision feedback to characterize tissues of varying stiffness. This paper focuses on evaluating the role of force feedback in minimally invasive surgery using an automated laparoscopic grasper developed in our laboratory. Several experiments with human subjects were performed to characterize various tissue samples using only vision feedback, only force feedback, both vision and force feedback, and direct exploration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laaki, H., Miche, Y., & Tammi, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2897018 · Cited by 341
Steinbach, E., Hirche, S., Ernst, M., Brandi, F., Chaudhari, R., Kammerl, J., & Vittorias, I. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2182100 · Cited by 198
Konstantinova, J., Jiang, A., Althoefer, K., Dasgupta, P., & Nanayakkara, T. (2014) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2014.2325794 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Tholey, G., Desai, J. P., & Castellanos, A. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-109
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W76008554
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000149301.60553.1e
- The paper
- Tholey, G., Desai, J. P., & Castellanos, A. E. (2005). Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000149301.60553.1e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.