Cited by 166Soft Robotics and ApplicationsTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsRobot Manipulation and Learning

Implementation of tactile sensing for palpation in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a review

Open access
Konstantinova, Jelizaveta, Jiang, Allen, Althoefer, Kaspar, Dasgupta, Prokar, Nanayakkara, Thrishantha·2014·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) made it possible to perform a number of medical manipulations with reduced patient trauma and better accuracy. Various devices, including tactile sensors, have been developed in recent years to enhance the quality of this procedure. The objective of this paper is to review the latest advancements and challenges in the development of tactile sensing devices designed for surgical applications. In particular, the focus is on palpation and probing devices that can be potentially used in RMIS. In addition, we explore the aspects that should be taken into account when designing tactile sensors for RMIS, incorporating biological inspiration of tactile sensing, features of manual palpation, requirements of RMIS. We provide an overview of recommendations for the development of tactile sensing devices, especially in the context of RMIS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2014.2325794

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konstantinova, J., Jiang, A., Althoefer, K., Dasgupta, P., & Nanayakkara, T.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2014-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
2490-2501
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2019690914
Cited by
166
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Program of the European Commission through the framework of European Union Project STIFF-FLOP (287728)
  • National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre through the Guy¿s and St Thomas¿ NHS Foundation Trust and King¿s College London
  • Guy¿s and St. Thomas¿ Charity
  • Vattikuti Foundation
  • National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
tactile sensing, robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, tactile sensors, manual palpation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review