Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 665

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Multicenter Study on Oncologic Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Cancer in Japan

Open access
Kitano, Seigo, Shiraishi, Norio, Uyama, Ichiro, Sugihara, Kenichi, Tanigawa, Nobuhiko·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Background: Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer is technically feasible, but it is not widely accepted because it has not been evaluated from the standpoint of oncologic outcome. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of a large series of patients in Japan to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods: The study group comprised 1294 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy during the period April 1994 through December 2003 in 16 participating surgical units (Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group). The short- and long-term outcomes of these patients were examined. Results: Distal gastrectomy was performed in 1185 patients (91.5%), proximal gastrectomy in 54 (4.2%), and total gastrectomy in 55 (4.3%); all were performed laparoscopically. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with these operations were 14.8% and 0%, respectively. Histologically, 1212 patients (93.7%) had stage IA disease, 75 (5.8%) had stage IB disease, and 7 (0.5%) had stage II disease (the UICC staging). Cancer recurred in only 6 (0.6%) of 1294 patients treated curatively (median follow-up, 36 months; range, 13–113 months). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 99.8% for stage IA disease, 98.7% for stage IB disease, and 85.7% for stage II disease. Conclusions: Although our findings may be considered preliminary, our data indicate that laparoscopic surgery for EGC yields good short- and long-term oncologic outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study of a large series of patients in Japan evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery for EGC yielded good short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 665

Metadata

Authors
Kitano, S., Shiraishi, N., Uyama, I., Sugihara, K., & Tanigawa, N.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-01
Volume
245
Issue
1
Pages
68-72
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978472480
Cited by
665
References
17
FWCI
22.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multicenter Study on Oncologic Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Cancer in Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8
The paper
Kitano, S., Shiraishi, N., Uyama, I., Sugihara, K., & Tanigawa, N. (2007). A Multicenter Study on Oncologic Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Cancer in Japan. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.