The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodal Perioperative Management Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection for Cancer
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. AIMS: This study evaluates the use of a multimodal package in colorectal cancer surgery in the context of an RCT. METHODS: Patients for elective resection for colorectal cancer were offered trial entry. Participants were stratified by sex and requirement for a total mesorectal excision and centrally randomized. Multimodal patients received intravenous fluid restriction, unrestricted oral intake with prokinetic agents, early ambulation, and fixed regimen epidural analgesia. Control patients received intravenous fluids to prevent oliguria, restricted oral intake until return of bowel motility, and weaning regimen epidural analgesia. Adherence to both regimens was reinforced using a daily checklist and protocol guidance sheets. Discharge decision was made using pre-agreed criteria. The primary endpoint was postoperative stay, and achievement of independence milestones. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications, readmission rates, and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Seventy patients were recruited. Approximately one fourth underwent TME. Median ages were similar (69.3 vs. 73.0 years). The median stay was significantly reduced in the multimodal group (5 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients in the control arm were 2.5 times as likely to require a postoperative stay of more than 5 days. Patients in the multimodal group had less cardiorespiratory and anastomotic complications but more readmissions. There were 2 deaths, both controls. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides level 1b evidence that a multimodal management protocol can significantly reduce postoperative stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Morbidity and mortality are not increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Hubner, M., Nygren, J., Demartines, N., Francis, N., Rockall, T. A., Young‐Fadok, T. M., Hill, A. G., Soop, M., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y · Cited by 2,119
Kehlet, H. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60357-8 · Cited by 561
Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Physical Therapy for the Critically Ill in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*
Kayambu, G., Boots, R., & Paratz, J. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827ca637 · Cited by 438
Behrns, K. E. (2012) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Khoo, C. K., Vickery, C. J., Forsyth, N., Vinall, N. S., & Eyre-Brook, I. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 867-872
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047746183
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodal Perioperative Management Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection for Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000259219.08209.36
- The paper
- Khoo, C. K., Vickery, C. J., Forsyth, N., Vinall, N. S., & Eyre-Brook, I. A. (2007). A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodal Perioperative Management Protocol in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection for Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000259219.08209.36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.