Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perioperative Mortality for Pancreatectomy: A National Perspective

Open access
McPhee, James T., Hill, Joshua S., Whalen, Giles F., Zayaruzny, Maksim, Litwin, Demetrius E., Sullivan, Mary E., Anderson, Frederick A., Tseng, Jennifer F.·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze in-hospital mortality after pancreatectomy using a large national database. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreatic resections, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and total pancreatectomy, remain the only potentially curative interventions for pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study was to define factors affecting outcomes after pancreatectomy for neoplasm. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using all patients undergoing pancreatic resections for neoplastic disease identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2003. Crude in-hospital mortality was analyzed by chi. A multivariable model was constructed to adjust for age, sex, hospital teaching status, hospital surgical volume, year of resection, payer status, and selected comorbid conditions. RESULTS: In all, 279,445 patient discharges were identified with a primary diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm. A total of 39,463 (14%) patients underwent resection during that hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was 5.9% with a significant decrease from 7.8% to 4.6% from 1998 to 2003 by trend analysis (P < 0.0001). Resections done at low (<5 procedures/year)- and medium (5-18/year)-volume centers had higher mortality compared with those at high (>18/year)-volume centers (low-volume odds ratio = 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.; medium-volume, odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.0). The proportion of procedures performed at high volume centers increased from 30% to 39% over the 6-year time period (P < 0.0001) by trend test. CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study demonstrates an improvement in operative mortality for patients undergoing pancreatectomy for neoplastic disease from 1998 to 2003. In addition, a greater proportion of pancreatectomies were performed at high-volume centers in 2003. The regionalization of pancreatic surgery may have partially contributed to the observed decrease in mortality rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000259993.17350.3a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
McPhee, J. T., Hill, J. S., Whalen, G. F., Zayaruzny, M., Litwin, D. E., Sullivan, M. E., Anderson, F. A., & Tseng, J. F.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-08
Volume
246
Issue
2
Pages
246-253
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036499896
Cited by
481
References
1
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Mortality for Pancreatectomy: A National Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000259993.17350.3a
The paper
McPhee, J. T., Hill, J. S., Whalen, G. F., Zayaruzny, M., Litwin, D. E., Sullivan, M. E., Anderson, F. A., & Tseng, J. F. (2007). Perioperative Mortality for Pancreatectomy: A National Perspective. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000259993.17350.3a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.