Cited by 159Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients.

Neumann, Tim, Neuner, Bruno, Weiss-Gerlach, Edith, T??nnesen, Hanne, Gentilello, Larry M., Wernecke, Klaus -D., Schmidt, Katrin, Schr??der, Torsten +7 more·2006·The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Abstract

Background One-third of injured patients treated in the emergency department (ED) have an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Few are screened and receive counseling because ED staff have little time for additional tasks. We hypothesized that computer technology can screen and provide an intervention that reduces at-risk drinking (British Medical Association criteria) in injured ED patients. Methods In all, 3,026 subcritically injured patients admitted to an ED were screened for an AUD using a laptop computer that administered the AUD Identification Test (AUDIT) and assessed motivation to reduce drinking. Patients with a positive AUDIT (n = 1,139) were randomized to an intervention (n = 563) or control (n = 576) condition. The computer generated a customized printout based on the patient's own alcohol use pattern, level of motivation, and personal factors, which was provided in the form of feedback and advice. Results Most patients (85%) used the computer with minimal assistance. At study entry, a similar proportion in each group met criteria for at-risk drinking (49.6% versus 46.8%, p = 0.355). At 6 months, 21.7% of intervention and 30.4% of control patients met criteria for at-risk drinking (p = 0.008). Intervention patients also had a 35.7% decrease in alcohol intake, compared with a 20.5% decrease in controls (p = 0.006). At 12 months, alcohol intake decreased by 22.8% in the intervention group versus 10.9% in controls (p = 0.023), but the proportion of at-risk drinkers did not s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ta.0000196399.29893.52

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, T., Neuner, B., Weiss-Gerlach, E., T??nnesen, H., Gentilello, L. M., Wernecke, K. D., Schmidt, K., Schr??der, T., Wauer, H., Heinz, A., Mann, K., M??ller, J. M., Haas, N., Kox, W. J., & Spies, C. D.
Affiliations
Stiftung Charité (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2006-10
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
805-814
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088207190
Cited by
159
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
hazardous drinking, alcoholism, trauma patients, emergency department, AUDIT screening, alcohol consumption reduction, automated feedback
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Algorithms, Berlin, Computers, Counseling, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Wounds and Injuries, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review