Cited by 57Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Alcohol Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention

Open access
Tansil, Kristin A., Esser, Marissa B., Sandhu, Paramjit, Reynolds, Jeffrey A., Elder, Randy W., Williamson, Rebecca S., Chattopadhyay, Sajal K., Bohm, Michele K. +6 more·2016·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Context Excessive drinking is responsible for one in ten deaths among working-age adults in the U.S. annually. Alcohol screening and brief intervention is an effective but underutilized intervention for reducing excessive drinking among adults. Electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) uses electronic devices to deliver key elements of alcohol screening and brief intervention, with the potential to expand population reach.Evidence acquisition Using Community Guide methods, a systematic review of the scientific literature on the effectiveness of e-SBI for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms was conducted. The search covered studies published from 1967 to October 2011. A total of 31 studies with 36 study arms met quality criteria and were included in the review. Analyses were conducted in 2012.Evidence synthesis Twenty-four studies (28 study arms) provided results for excessive drinkers only and seven studies (eight study arms) reported results for all drinkers. Nearly all studies found that e-SBI reduced excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: nine study arms reported a median 23.9% reduction in binge-drinking intensity (maximum drinks/binge episode) and nine study arms reported a median 16.5% reduction in binge-drinking frequency. Reductions in drinking measures were sustained for up to 12 months.Conclusions According to Community Guide rules of evidence, e-SBI is an effective method for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms among intervention participants. Implementation of e-SBI could complement population-level strategies previously recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force for reducing excessive drinking (e.g., increasing alcohol taxes and regulating alcohol outlet density).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.013

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [41]Bryant ZE Testing the effectiveness of e-mailed BASICS feedback with college students Dissertation Auburn Graduate School, Auburn University 2009
  2. [48]Hedman AS Effects of personalized feedback and tailored health communication on alcohol consumption, alcohol-related behaviors, and attitude among binge drinking college students Dissertation Department of Health, Sports, and Exercise Science, University of Kansas 2007
  3. [78]Kypri K Vater T Bowe SJ Web-based alcohol intervention for Māori university students Addiction 2013 108 2 331 338 10.1001/jama.2014.2138 22925046 PMC3588153 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tansil, K. A., Esser, M. B., Sandhu, P., Reynolds, J. A., Elder, R. W., Williamson, R. S., Chattopadhyay, S. K., Bohm, M. K., Brewer, R. D., McKnight-Eily, L. R., Hungerford, D. W., Toomey, T. L., Hingson, R. W., & Fielding, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Elder, Randy W.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
801-811
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531085575
Cited by
57
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
alcohol screening, brief intervention, excessive alcohol consumption, binge drinking, alcohol-related harm, digital health interventions, intervention effectiveness, harm reduction
MeSH terms
Humans, Mass Screening, Telecommunications, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review