Cited by 68Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Neuroprotection after Transient Global Cerebral Ischemia in Wld s Mutant Mice

Gillingwater, Thomas H., Haley, Jane E., Ribchester, Richard R., Horsburgh, Karen·2004·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

The Wld s mouse mutant demonstrates a remarkable phenotype of delayed axonal and synaptic degeneration after nerve lesion. In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that expression of Wld protein is neuroprotective in an in vivo mouse model of global cerebral ischemia. This model is associated with selective neuronal degeneration in specific brain regions such as the caudate nucleus and CA2 hippocampal pyramidal cell layer. The extent of neuronal damage was quantified in Wld s compared to wild-type mice after an identical episode of global cerebral ischemia. The results demonstrated a significant and marked reduction in the extent of neuronal damage in Wld s as compared to wild-type C57Bl/6 mice. In the caudate nucleus, Wld expression significantly reduced the percentage of ischemic neuronal damage after global ischemia (Wld s , 27.7 ± 16.8%; wild-type mice, 58.7 ± 32.3%; P = 0.036). Similarly, in the CA2 pyramidal cell layer, there was a significant reduction of neuronal damage in the Wld s mice as compared to wild-type mice after ischemia (Wld s , 17.7 ± 23.0%; wild-type mice, 41.9 ± 28.0%; P < 0.023). Thus, these results clearly demonstrate that the Wld gene confers substantial neuroprotection after cerebral ischemia, and suggest a new role to that previously described for Wld s .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.wcb.0000095798.98378.34

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillingwater, T. H., Haley, J. E., Ribchester, R. R., & Horsburgh, K.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Gillingwater, Thomas H.
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2004-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
62-66
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2133648237
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
neuroprotection, transient global cerebral ischemia, neurodegeneration, caudate nucleus, axonal degeneration, synaptic degeneration, ischemic neuronal injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Caudate Nucleus, Brain Ischemia, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Carotid Stenosis, Muscle, Skeletal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review