Cited by 257Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Dopamine dysregulation syndrome in Parkinson's disease

Evans, Andrew H, Lees, Andrew J·2004·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dopamine replacement therapy in Parkinson's disease ameliorates motor symptoms. However, it has recently been recognized that a small sub-group of patients suffer motor and behavioural disturbances attributable to taking quantities of medication well beyond the dose required to treat their motor disabilities. This review examines the phenomenology of dopamine dysregulation syndrome in relation to the current understanding of basal ganglia function and its impact on long-term management. RECENT FINDINGS: Cortico-striato-thalamic circuits are implicated in the behavioural and motor disturbances associated with compulsive medication use in Parkinson's disease. Advances in understanding of the role of dopamine in psychostimulant addiction are important in helping to understand dopamine dysregulation. SUMMARY: Recognition of dopamine dysregulation syndrome and characterization of its phenomenology supports the notion that the medication used to treat Parkinson's disease can disrupt basal ganglia mediated motor and behavioural functioning. Refinement of clinical strategies to predict, identify and manage this syndrome will aid the future treatment of motor and non-motor complications of Parkinson's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.wco.0000137528.23126.41

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These symptoms called dopamine dysregulation syndrome or impulse control disorders are increasingly recognized in Parkinson's disease.

    “These symptoms that together have been called dopamine dysregulation syndrome or impulse control disorders are increasingly recognized (Evans and Lees 2004).”

    From The clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease. (2016) · cites this paper as Evans and Lees 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, A. H., & Lees, A. J.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Lees, Andrew J
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2004-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
393-398
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979587906
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dopamine dysregulation syndrome, Parkinson's disease, dopamine replacement therapy, basal ganglia, stimulant use disorder, long-term management
MeSH terms
Animals, Antiparkinson Agents, Basal Ganglia, Mental Disorders, Dopamine, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Reward, Ventral Tegmental Area, Dopamine Agonists, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review