Cited by 159Innovations in Medical EducationEthics in medical practiceHealth, Medicine and Society

More Than a List of Values and Desired Behaviors: A Foundational Understanding of Medical Professionalism

Open access
Wynia, Matthew K., Papadakis, Maxine A., Sullivan, William M., Hafferty, Frederic W.·2014·Academic Medicine

Abstract

The term "professionalism" has been used in a variety of ways. In 2012, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) Standing Committee on Ethics and Professionalism undertook to develop an operational definition of professionalism that would speak to the variety of certification and maintenance-of-certification activities undertaken by ABMS and its 24 member boards. In the course of this work, the authors reviewed prior definitions of professions and professionalism and found them to be largely descriptive, or built around lists of proposed professional attributes, values, and behaviors. The authors argue that while making lists of desirable professional characteristics is necessary and useful for teaching and assessment, it is not, by itself, sufficient either to fully define professionalism or to capture its social functions. Thus, the authors sought to extend earlier work by articulating a definition that explains professionalism as the motivating force for an occupational group to come together and create, publicly profess, and develop reliable mechanisms to enforce shared promises-all with the purpose of ensuring that practitioners are worthy of patients' and the public's trust.Using this framework, the authors argue that medical professionalism is a normative belief system about how best to organize and deliver health care. Believing in professionalism means accepting the premise that health professionals must come together to continually define, debate, declare, distribute, and enforce the shared competency standards and ethical values that govern their work. The authors identify three key implications of this new definition for individual clinicians and their professional organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000000212

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA. The Professions. London: Oxford University Press, At the Clarendon Press; 1933.
  2. Hughes EC. Professions in society. Can J Econ Polit Sci. 1960;26(1):54-61.
  3. Swick HM.Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;75(6):612-616.
  4. American Association of Medical Colleges -National Board of Medical Examiners. Embedding Professionalism in Medical Education: Assessment as a Tool for Implementation. Report From an Invitational Conference Cosponsored By the Association of American Medical Colleges and National Board of Medical Examiners. Baltimore, MD, 2002. (http://www.bumc.bu.edu/mec/files/2010/06/NBME_AAMC_ProfessReport2002. pdf ). Accessed March 19, 2013.
  5. Cruess Rl, Johnston S, Cruess SR. Profession: a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(1):74-76.
  6. Jackson, JA. Professions and Professionalization: Volume 3, Sociological Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wynia, M. K., Papadakis, M. A., Sullivan, W. M., & Hafferty, F. W.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wynia, Matthew K.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2014-05
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
712-714
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087581522
Cited by
159
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
FWCI
17.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
medical professionalism, American Board of Medical Specialties, maintenance of certification, professional associations, trust in healthcare, competency standards
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physician's Role, Professional Competence, Social Perception, Social Values, Specialty Boards, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review