More Than a List of Values and Desired Behaviors: A Foundational Understanding of Medical Professionalism
Open accessAbstract
The term "professionalism" has been used in a variety of ways. In 2012, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) Standing Committee on Ethics and Professionalism undertook to develop an operational definition of professionalism that would speak to the variety of certification and maintenance-of-certification activities undertaken by ABMS and its 24 member boards. In the course of this work, the authors reviewed prior definitions of professions and professionalism and found them to be largely descriptive, or built around lists of proposed professional attributes, values, and behaviors. The authors argue that while making lists of desirable professional characteristics is necessary and useful for teaching and assessment, it is not, by itself, sufficient either to fully define professionalism or to capture its social functions. Thus, the authors sought to extend earlier work by articulating a definition that explains professionalism as the motivating force for an occupational group to come together and create, publicly profess, and develop reliable mechanisms to enforce shared promises-all with the purpose of ensuring that practitioners are worthy of patients' and the public's trust.Using this framework, the authors argue that medical professionalism is a normative belief system about how best to organize and deliver health care. Believing in professionalism means accepting the premise that health professionals must come together to continually define, debate, declare, distribute, and enforce the shared competency standards and ethical values that govern their work. The authors identify three key implications of this new definition for individual clinicians and their professional organizations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Professionalism: The Third Logic
Freidson, E. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3090041 · Cited by 2,515 · see citing works
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter
(2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07684-5 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
A Behavioral and Systems View of Professionalism
Lesser, C. S. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1864 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability
Cohen, J. J. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02512.x · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Professional Autonomy and the Social Control of Expertise
Rueschemeyer, D. (1983) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16979-5_3 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
The Role of Professionalism and Self-regulation in Detecting Impaired or Incompetent Physicians
Wynia, M. K. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.945 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation[Medical professionalism in the new millenium: a physicians charter].
Pavlica, P., & Barozzi, L. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA. The Professions. London: Oxford University Press, At the Clarendon Press; 1933.
- Hughes EC. Professions in society. Can J Econ Polit Sci. 1960;26(1):54-61.
- Swick HM.Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;75(6):612-616.
- American Association of Medical Colleges -National Board of Medical Examiners. Embedding Professionalism in Medical Education: Assessment as a Tool for Implementation. Report From an Invitational Conference Cosponsored By the Association of American Medical Colleges and National Board of Medical Examiners. Baltimore, MD, 2002. (http://www.bumc.bu.edu/mec/files/2010/06/NBME_AAMC_ProfessReport2002. pdf ). Accessed March 19, 2013.
- Cruess Rl, Johnston S, Cruess SR. Profession: a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(1):74-76.
- Jackson, JA. Professions and Professionalization: Volume 3, Sociological Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education
Howell, B. A., Kristal, R. B., Whitmire, L. R., Gentry, M., Rabin, T. L., & Rosenbaum, J. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Climbing Social Media in Medicine’s Hierarchy of Needs
Chretien, K. C., & Kind, T. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000430 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Examining Health Care Students’ Attitudes toward E-Professionalism
Gettig, J. P., Noronha, S., Graneto, J., Obucina, L., Christensen, K. J., & Fjortoft, N. F. (2016) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8010169 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wynia, M. K., Papadakis, M. A., Sullivan, W. M., & Hafferty, F. W.
- Affiliations
- San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wynia, Matthew K.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 712-714
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087581522
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- medical professionalism, American Board of Medical Specialties, maintenance of certification, professional associations, trust in healthcare, competency standards
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physician's Role, Professional Competence, Social Perception, Social Values, Specialty Boards, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review