Cited by 39Reflective Practices in EducationInnovations in Medical EducationMobile Learning in Education

Using a Smartphone App and Coaching Group Sessions to Promote Residents’ Reflection in the Workplace

Open access
Könings, Karen D., van Berlo, Jean, Koopmans, Richard, Hoogland, Henk, Spanjers, Ingrid A.E., ten Haaf, Jeroen A., van der Vleuten, Cees P.M., van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.·2016·Academic Medicine

Abstract

PROBLEM: Reflecting on workplace-based experiences is necessary for professional development. However, residents need support to raise their awareness of valuable moments for learning and to thoughtfully analyze those learning moments afterwards. APPROACH: From October to December 2012, the authors held a multidisciplinary six-week postgraduate training module focused on general competencies. Residents were randomly assigned to one of four conditions with varying degrees of reflection support; they were offered (1) a smartphone app, (2) coaching group sessions, (3) a combination of both, or (4) neither type of support. The app allowed participants to capture in real time learning moments as a text note, audio recording, picture, or video. Coaching sessions held every two weeks aimed to deepen participants' reflection on captured learning moments. Questionnaire responses and reflection data were compared between conditions to assess the effects of the app and coaching sessions on intensity and frequency of reflection. OUTCOMES: Sixty-four residents participated. App users reflected more often, captured more learning moments, and reported greater learning progress than nonapp users. Participants who attended coaching sessions were more alert to learning moments and pursued more follow-up learning activities to improve on the general competencies. Those who received both types of support were most alert to these learning moments. NEXT STEPS: A simple mobile app for capturing learning moments shows promise as a tool to support workplace-based learning, especially when combined with coaching sessions. Future research should evaluate these tools on a broader scale and in conjunction with residents' and students' personal digital portfolios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000000989

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Könings, K. D., van Berlo, J., Koopmans, R., Hoogland, H., Spanjers, I. A. E., ten Haaf, J. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Könings, Karen D.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2016-03
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
365-370
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169980830
Cited by
39
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
reflective practice, workplace learning, medical residents, mobile application, coaching, teachable moments, transferable skills, graduate medical education, mobile learning, e-portfolio
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Mentors, Netherlands, Random Allocation, Self-Assessment, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review