Cited by 115Innovations in Medical EducationCoaching Methods and ImpactMentoring and Academic Development

Identifying coaching skills to improve feedback use in postgraduate medical education

Open access
Armson, Heather, Lockyer, Jocelyn M, Zetkulic, Marygrace, Könings, Karen D, Sargeant, Joan·2019·Medical Education

Abstract

Objectives: Coaching in medical education has recently gained prominence, but minimal attention has been given to key skills and determining how they work to effectively ensure residents are progressing and developing self‐assessment skills. This study examined process‐oriented and content‐oriented coaching skills used in coaching sessions, with particular attention to how supervisors use them to enhance resident acceptance of feedback to enhance learning. Methods: This qualitative study analysed secondary audiotaped data from 15 supervisors: resident dyads during two feedback sessions, 4 months apart. The R2C2 model was used to engage the resident, build a r elationship, explore r eactions to feedback, explore resident perceptions of c ontent, and c oach for change. Framework analysis was used, including familiarisation with the data, identifying the thematic framework, indexing and charting the data and mapping and interpretation. Results: Process skills included preparation, relationship development, using micro communication skills and techniques to promote reflection and self‐assessment by the resident and supervisor flexibility. Content skills related to the specific feedback content included engaging the resident in discussion, ensuring the discussion was collaborative and focused on goal setting, co‐developing a Learning Change Plan, ensuring resident commitment and following up on the plan. Together, these skills foster agency in the resident learner. Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis: the interconnectedness of process and content; tensions between encouraging self‐direction and ensuring progress and competence; and balancing a coaching dialogue and a teaching monologue. Conclusions: Effective coaching by supervisors requires a combination of specific process and content skills that are chosen depending on the needs of the individual resident. Mastering these skills helps residents engage and develop agency in their own professional development. These outcomes depend on faculty maintaining a balance between coaching and teaching, encouraging resident self‐direction and ensuring progression to competence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.13818

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Broadly reported themes of coaching focused on coachee development and/or performance, with medicine-specific models R2C2 and PRACTICE and general models SMART goals and GROW being cited.

    “The broadly reported themes of coaching focused on coachee development and/or performance, with medicine-specific models such as R2C2 [152], and PRACTICE [138], and general coaching models such as SMART goals [161], and GROW [162] being cited.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [30]30. Ward D, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs 2013;69 (11):2423-31.
  2. [35]35. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21 (1):16-20.
  3. [46]46. Stanier M. The Coaching Habit: Say Less, Ask More and Change the Way You Lead Forever. Toronto, ON: Box of Crayons Press 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armson, H., Lockyer, J. M., Zetkulic, M., Könings, K. D., & Sargeant, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Armson, Heather
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
477-493
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2915951473
Cited by
115
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Board of Medical Examiners (2014‐16)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
Keywords
coaching skills, feedback use, graduate medical education, resident supervision, self-assessment, goal setting, reflection
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Graduate, Faculty, Medical, Feedback, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Self-Assessment, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review