Cited by 96Career Development and DiversityDiversity and Career in MedicineHigher Education Research Studies

The Stanford Medical Youth Science program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students

Winkleby, Marilyn A.·2007·Academic Medicine

Abstract

The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program (SMYSP) is a biomedical pipeline program that seeks to diversify the health professions by providing academic enrichment in the medical sciences and college admissions support to very low-income high school students. Each summer 24 students are recruited from over 250 California high schools for the five-week residential program, led by 10 undergraduate students. Participants divide their time between classroom instruction, anatomy practicums, hospital field placements, research projects, and college admissions advising. Since its inception in 1988, 405 students have completed SMYSP and 96% have been observed for up to 18 years. The majority are from underrepresented minority groups (33.3% Latino, 21.7% African American, 4.0% Native American), many with poor academic preparation. One hundred percent of age-eligible participants have graduated from high school, and 99% have been admitted to college. Of those admitted to college (and not currently college students), 81% have earned a four-year college degree, the majority majoring in biological and physical sciences (57.1%). Among four-year college graduates, 52% are attending or have graduated from medical or graduate school. Many of the four-year college graduates (44.4%) are becoming or have become health professionals. This program, distinguished by direct participation in the sciences, strong mentoring, college admissions preparation, and long-term career guidance, has been highly…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e31802d8de6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiences beyond didactics, including anatomy practicals and shadowing, increased high school graduation rates, the pursuit of science degrees, and interest in health professions.

    “Experiences beyond didactics, including anatomy practicals and shadowing, increased high school graduation rates, the pursuit of science degrees, and interest in health professions [7,21,25].”
  • Integrating clinical experience with mentorship may help stimulate interest in healthcare by providing firsthand experience.

    “Integrating clinical experience with mentorship may help stimulate interest in healthcare by providing firsthand experience [7,21,25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkleby, M. A.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Winkleby, Marilyn A.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2007-02
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
139-145
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112936116
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • California Endowment
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R25HL075748)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
underrepresented minority students, diversity in health professions, mentoring, college graduation rates, medical school admissions, career guidance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, California, Career Choice, Education, Premedical, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Program Development, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review