Cited by 141Innovations in Medical EducationHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Redesigning Residency Training in Internal Medicine: The Consensus Report of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force

Meyers, Frederick J., Weinberger, Steven E., Fitzgibbons, John P., Glassroth, Jeffrey, Duffy, F Daniel, Clayton, Charles P.·2007·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Because of numerous criticisms of the content and structure of residency training, redesigning graduate medical education (GME) has become a high priority for the internal medicine community. From 2005 to 2007, the leadership of the internal medicine community, working under the auspices of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force, developed six recommendations it will pursue to improve residency education: (1) focus education around a "core" of internal medicine, which provides the framework for both the structure and content of residents' educational experiences, (2) fully adopt competency-based evaluation and advancement, which will enhance training by focusing on individual learners' needs, (3) allow for increased, resident-centered education beyond the internal medicine core, because different types of practice require customized knowledge and skills, (4) improve ambulatory training by providing patient-centered longitudinal care that addresses the conflict between inpatient and outpatient responsibilities, (5) use new faculty models that emphasize the creation of a core faculty, and (6) align institutional and programmatic resources with the goals of redesign, balancing the clinical mission of the institution with the educational goals of residency training. Adoption of these recommendations will require significant efforts, including pilot projects, faculty development, changes in accreditation requirements, and modifications of GME funding systems. Opportunities are ample for individual programs to develop creative approaches based on the framework for educational redesign outlined in this article, and for these educational and clinical redesign initiatives to work hand-in-hand for the benefit of patients, faculty, trainees, and institutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e318159d010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyers, F. J., Weinberger, S. E., Fitzgibbons, J. P., Glassroth, J., Duffy, F. D., & Clayton, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Meyers, Frederick J.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2007-12
Volume
82
Issue
12
Pages
1211-1219
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167128578
Cited by
141
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
internal medicine residency, graduate medical education, competency-based evaluation, core curriculum, ambulatory training, longitudinal care, institutional alignment, accreditation
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Ambulatory Care, Career Choice, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Graduate, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Inpatients, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Quality of Health Care, United States, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review