Cited by 43Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Education

Perspective: After a Century of Criticizing Premedical Education, Are We Missing the Point?

Gross, Jeffrey P., Mommaerts, Corina D., Earl, David, De Vries, Raymond G.·2008·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Ever since Abraham Flexner formalized the idea of premedical education in 1910, medical educators have argued about how best to prepare students for medical school. This back-and-forth about the premedical years has focused almost exclusively on the range and content of the required course work; noticeably absent from the debate is consideration of the ways in which the experience of the premedical years-including the curricular and noncurricular demands placed on students-shape the moral education of the next generation of physicians. The authors review the century-long conversation about premedical education, highlighting the themes of that discussion and the important aspects of being a "premed" that have not been a part of the conversation. From their systematic review of college and university Web sites designed for premedical students and from comments collected from a symposium on the premedical years, the authors describe how life as a premedical student, and not just curricular content, teaches important lessons about what it means to be a professional. The authors also report important disparities in attitudes about premedical education; for example, premedical advisors regard the "sifting process" of premedical education as a "journey of discovery," whereas students describe their premedical years as a competition. The authors' work suggests a new approach to premedical education, an approach that combines the coursework needed to succeed in medical school with formal opportunities to reflect on both the positive and pernicious effects of the premedical years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e31816bdb58

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gross, J. P., Mommaerts, C. D., Earl, D., & De Vries, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2008-05
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
516-520
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977489045
Cited by
43
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
premedical education, medical school admissions, professional identity, premedical students, sifting process, history of medical education, Abraham Flexner, student attitudes
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Premedical, Humans, School Admission Criteria, United States, Organizational Culture, Moral Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review