The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiciansʼ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that physicians' empathy is associated with positive clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. METHOD: A correlational study design was used in a university-affiliated outpatient setting. Participants were 891 diabetic patients, treated between July 2006 and June 2009, by 29 family physicians. Results of the most recent hemoglobin A1c and LDL-C tests were extracted from the patients' electronic records. The results of hemoglobin A1c tests were categorized into good control (<7.0%) and poor control (>9.0%). Similarly, the results of the LDL-C tests were grouped into good control (<100) and poor control (>130). The physicians, who completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy in 2009, were grouped into high, moderate, and low empathy scorers. Associations between physicians' level of empathy scores and patient outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Patients of physicians with high empathy scores were significantly more likely to have good control of hemoglobin A1c (56%) than were patients of physicians with low empathy scores (40%, P < .001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with good LDL-C control was significantly higher for physicians with high empathy scores (59%) than physicians with low scores (44%, P < .001). Logistic regression analyses indicated that physicians' empathy had a unique contribution to the prediction of optimal clinical outcomes after controlling for physicians' and patients' gender and age, and patients' health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis of a positive relationship between physicians' empathy and patients' clinical outcomes was confirmed, suggesting that physicians' empathy is an important factor associated with clinical competence and patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009
American Diabetes Association (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-s013 · Cited by 2,167
Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values
Nathan, D. M., Kuenen, J., Borg, R., Zheng, H., Schoenfeld, D., Heine, R. J., & for the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) Study Group (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-0545 · Cited by 1,812
Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters
Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002 · Cited by 1,069
The Effects of Physician Empathy on Patient Satisfaction and Compliance
Kim, S. S., Kaplowitz, S., & Johnston, M. V. (2004) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278704267037 · Cited by 1,063
An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T. J., Rattner, S., Erdmann, J. B., Gonnella, J. S., & Magee, M. (2004) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01911.x · Cited by 864
Self-citationZachariae, R., Pedersen, C. G., Jensen, A. B., Ehrnrooth, E., Rossen, P. B., & von der Maase, H. (2003) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600798 · Cited by 601
Mood Change and Empathy Decline Persist during Three Years of Internal Medicine Training
Bellini, L. M., & Shea, J. A. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200502000-00013 · Cited by 314
Squier, R. W. (1990) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90188-x · Cited by 305
Greenberg, L. S., Elliott, R., Watson, J. C., & Bohart, A. C. (2001) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.380 · Cited by 106
Cited by
From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider
Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1713 · Cited by 3,462
Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review
Derksen, F., Bensing, J., & Lagro-Janssen, A. (2013) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x660814 · Cited by 1,034
The Role of Empathy in Health and Social Care Professionals
Moudatsou, M., Stavropoulou, A., Philalithis, A., & Koukouli, S. (2020) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare8010026 · Cited by 645
Patient-clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline
Gilligan, T., Coyle, N., Frankel, R. M., Berry, D. L., Bohlke, K., Epstein, R. M., Finlay, E., Jackson, V. A., Lathan, C. S., Loprinzi, C. L., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.75.2311 · Cited by 610
Pfattheicher, S., Nockur, L., Böhm, R., Sassenrath, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620964422 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-364
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127559536
- Cited by
- 1,203
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 32.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiciansʼ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182086fe1
- The paper
- Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011). Physiciansʼ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182086fe1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.