Cited by 34Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

Reassessment of the role of cannabinoids in the management of pain

Beaulieu, Pierre, Ware, Mark·2007·Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to assess the role of cannabinoids in the treatment of acute and chronic pain in humans. RECENT FINDINGS: Very few clinical trials looking at the analgesic effects of cannabinoids in the acute pain settings have been performed. Three recent studies have evaluated the oral administration of synthetic cannabinoids in postoperative pain. At low doses cannabinoids are not different from placebo, whereas at high doses they may be associated with adverse effects or even worsening of pain intensity. In chronic pain patients, the safety and analgesic efficacy of a number of cannabinoid compounds have recently been evaluated in several clinical trials in several chronic pain conditions. While the small size of the trials and the relatively short duration of follow-up limits broad generalization, to date there is increasing evidence that cannabinoids are safe and effective for refractory chronic pain conditions including neuropathic pain associated with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and peripheral neuropathy associated with HIV/AIDS. SUMMARY: The precise role of cannabinoids in pain treatment still needs further evaluation. Cannabinoid compounds may be more effective in the context of chronic neuropathic pain than for the management of acute pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aco.0b013e3282efd175

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on the authors' review of the literature, cannabinoids exhibit their greatest efficacy when employed for the management of neuropathic pain.

    “Based upon our reviews of the literature, cannabinoids exhibit their greatest efficacy when employed for the management of neuropathic pain (Tables 7 and 8).132”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaulieu, P., & Ware, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Beaulieu, Pierre
Venue
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Published
2007-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
473-477
ISSN
0952-7907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999922206
Cited by
34
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
cannabinoids, pain management, analgesia, chronic pain, acute pain, postoperative pain, neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy, synthetic cannabinoids, adverse effects, drug safety
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Administration, Inhalation, Administration, Oral, Cannabinoids, Chronic Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Dronabinol, Anti-Anxiety Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review