CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Electronic Cigarette Use Among Pregnant Women

Mark, Katrina S., Farquhar, Brooke, Chisolm, Margaret S., Coleman-Cowger, Victoria H., Terplan, Mishka·2015·Journal of Addiction Medicine
DOI 10.1097/adm.0000000000000128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are a relatively recent phenomenon, serving dual roles as an alternative vehicle for nicotine delivery and a smoking-cessation tool. The purpose of this study was to determine pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding electronic cigarettes. Study design A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to a convenience sample of pregnant women presenting to a university-based outpatient clinic. After survey completion, participants received information about smoking cessation and e-cigarettes. Data were examined using χ² and Fisher exact tests and analysis of variance. Stata was used for the analysis. Results Of the 326 surveys distributed, 316 were completed (97%). Of the 316 participants, 42 (13%) reported having ever used e-cigarettes. Only 2 (0.6%) reported current daily use. Ever users were slightly older (27.3 years vs 25.4 years; P = 0.007) and more likely to be current smokers (43% vs. 14%; P Conclusions Misconceptions about e-cigarettes are common among pregnant women, potentially motivating use that may pose risks to both maternal and child health. Screening and education regarding e-cigarettes should be included in prenatal care. Future research in this area is necessary, including research examining pregnancy outcomes among women who use e-cigarettes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000128

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Adkinson, 2013, Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey., Am J Prev Med, 44, 207, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018 · DOI
  2. 2010, Smoking cessation during pregnancy: Committee Opinion 471., Obsetet Gynecol, 116, 1241, 10.1097/00006250-201011000-00054 · DOI
  3. 2011, Tobacco use and womens health: Committee Opinion 503., Obstet Gynecol, 118, 746, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182310ca9 · DOI
  4. Belluzzi, 2005, Acetaldehyde enhances acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats., Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 705, 10.1038/sj.npp.1300586 · DOI
  5. Bhatagnar, 2014, Electronic cigarettes: a policy statement from the American Heart Association., Circulation, 130, 1418, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000107 · DOI
  6. Breland, 2014, Science and electronic cigarettes: current data, future needs., J Addict Med, 8, 223, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000049 · DOI
  7. Bullen, 2013, Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial., Lancet, 382, 1629, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2013, Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school studentsUnited States 2011-2012., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 62, 729
  9. Chapman, 2014, E-cigarette prevalence and correlates of use among adolescents versus adults: a review and comparison., J Psychiatr Res, 54, 43, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.005 · DOI
  10. Choi, 2013, Characteristics associated with awareness, perceptions, and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems among young US Midwestern adults., Am J Public Health, 103, 556, 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300947 · DOI
  11. Coleman, 2010, Efficacy and safety of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis., Addiction, 106, 52, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03179.x · DOI
  12. Dawkins, 2014, Acute electronic cigarette use: nicotine delivery and subjective effects in regular users., Psychopharmacology, 231, 401, 10.1007/s00213-013-3249-8 · DOI
  13. Delucchi, 2009, Development of the Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (S-KAP) instrument., J Drug Issues, 39, 347, 10.1177/002204260903900207 · DOI
  14. Duffy, 2014, Electronic cigarettes: the new face of nicotine., Pediatrics, 134, 1, 10.1542/peds.2013-3182 · DOI
  15. England, 2014, Screening practices and attitudes of obstetrician-gynecologists toward new and emerging tobacco products., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 211, 1e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.041 · DOI
  16. Etter, 2011, Electronic cigarette: users profile utilization, satisfaction, and perceived efficacy., Addiction, 106, 2017, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x · DOI
  17. Franck, 2014, Electronic cigarettes in North America: history, use, and implications for smoking cessation., Circulation, 129, 1945, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006416 · DOI
  18. Gupta, 2004, Smokeless tobacco use, birth weight, and gestational age: population based, prospective cohort study of 1217 women in Mumbai, India., BMJ, 328, 1538, 10.1136/bmj.38113.687882.EB · DOI
  19. Hajek, 2014, Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit., Addiction, 109, 1801, 10.1111/add.12659 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hutzler, 2014, Chemical hazards present in liquids and vapors of electronic cigarettes., Arch Toxicol, 88, 1295, 10.1007/s00204-014-1294-7 · DOI
  21. King, 2013, Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010-2011., Nicotine Tob Res, 15, 1623, 10.1093/ntr/ntt013 · DOI
  22. Pearson, 2012, E-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in U.S. adults., Am J Pub Health, 102, 1758, 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526 · DOI
  23. Pepper, 2014, Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review., Tob Control, 23, 375, 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051122 · DOI
  24. Pepper, 2014, How U.S. adults find out about electronic cigarettes: implications for public health messages., Nicotine Tob Res, 16, 1140, 10.1093/ntr/ntu060 · DOI
  25. Suftin, 2013, Electronic cigarette use by college students., Drug Alcohol Depend, 131, 214, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001 · DOI
  26. Trumbo, 2013, Use and perception of electronic cigarettes among college students., J Am Coll Health, 61, 149, 10.1080/07448481.2013.776052 · DOI
  27. 2009, S. Preventive Services Task Force. Counseling and interventions to prevent tobacco use and tobacco-caused disease in adults and pregnant women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement., Ann Intern Med, 150, 551, 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00009 · DOI
  28. Vansickel, 2013, Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration., Nicotine Tob Res, 15, 267, 10.1093/ntr/ntr316 · DOI
  29. Weaver, 2014, Electronic cigarettes: a review of safety and clinical issues., J Addict Med, 8, 234, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000043 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mark, K. S., Farquhar, B., Chisolm, M. S., Coleman-Cowger, V. H., & Terplan, M.
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2015-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
266-272
ISSN
1932-0620
DOI
10.1097/adm.0000000000000128
Cited by
138
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review