Cited by 10Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomelessness and Social IssuesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Home Visits in the Outpatient Treatment of Individuals Dependent on Alcohol: Randomized Clinical Trial

Moraes, Edilaine, de Campos, Geraldo Mendes, Figlie, Neliana Buzie, Ferraz, Marcos Bosi, Laranjeira, Ronaldo·2010·Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment

Abstract

Aim To compare the efficacy and effectiveness of conventional outpatient treatment for alcoholic patients [conventional treatment (CT)] with this same CT plus home visit (HV). Design Randomized clinical trial evaluated alongside a 12-week. Setting An outpatient clinic for alcohol dependents. Participants One hundred twenty alcohol-dependent patients, randomized to CT or HV groups, with homogeneous clinic and sociodemographic characteristics (P>0.1). Ninety percent were male, the mean age was 43 years (SD=8.6), 41.7% were married, and 32.5% had a low educational level. Measurements The main outcome measures were adherence, abstinence, and days of consumption. Other outcomes measured were quality of life (Short Form Health Survey-36), motivation for treatment (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale and University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale), severity of problems in areas of life (Addiction Severity Index), and cognitive impairments (Frontal Assessment Battery). Findings Adherence—85.5% for HV and 62.1% for CT (P=0.003); quality of life mental area—51.2% for HV and 48.6% for CT (P=0.006). Outcomes, such as abstinence cases and decreased problems in areas of life, showed statistically significant improvements favoring HV. Conclusions The HV treatment provided better results than CT in many important outcomes, not only regarding the success of the treatment, but also for the improvement of the quality of life of the patients and their relatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adt.0b013e318196d4e5

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moraes, E., de Campos, G. M., Figlie, N. B., Ferraz, M. B., & Laranjeira, R.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Moraes, Edilaine
  • Laranjeira, Ronaldo
Venue
Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment
Published
2010-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
18-31
ISSN
1531-5754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043730082
Cited by
10
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
home visits, alcoholism, outpatient care, medication adherence, abstinence, quality of life, treatment motivation, cognitive impairment, frontal lobe function, Addiction Severity Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review