The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of a Tailored Positive Psychology Intervention on Well-Being and Pain in Individuals With Chronic Pain and a Physical Disability: A Feasibility Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a computer-based positive psychology intervention in individuals with a physical disability and chronic pain. METHODS: Individuals with spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disease, or postpolio syndrome and chronic pain were randomly assigned to a positive psychology or a control condition. Participants in the intervention group were instructed to practice 4 personalized positive psychology exercises. Participants in the control group were instructed to write about life details for 8 weeks. Participants completed online well-being and pain-related questionnaires at baseline, posttreatment, and at the 2.5-month follow-up, and rated treatment satisfaction at posttreatment. RESULTS: Ninety-six participants were randomized and 68 (70%) completed follow-up assessments. Participants in the positive psychology intervention group reported significant pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in pain intensity, pain control, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, life satisfaction, positive affect, and depression. Improvements in life satisfaction, depression, pain intensity, pain interference, and pain control were maintained to the 2.5-month follow-up. Participants in the control group reported significant pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in life satisfaction, and pretreatment to follow-up improvements in pain intensity and pain control. Significant between-group differences, favoring the treatment group, emerged for pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in pain intensity and pain control. Participants were similarly satisfied with both treatments. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The results support the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a computer-based positive psychology intervention for improving well-being and pain-related outcomes in individuals with physical disabilities and chronic pain, and indicate that a full trial of the intervention is warranted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while passive strategies are linked to poorer outcomes such as increased pain and depression 258, 267–270.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [270]
In the citing paper
“Active coping strategies, for example, have been linked to positive affect, better psychological adjustment, and decreased depression while passive strategies are linked to poorer outcomes such as increased pain and depression 258, 267–270.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [270]
In the citing paper
“predicts functional pain outcomes.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [270]
In the citing paper
“Pain-related self-efficacy, a protective factor for patients with persistent pain and a resiliency factorfor children, adolescents, and adults with chronic pain 270, predicts functional pain outcomes.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [270]
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Cs, C., & Km, R. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 5,178
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.377 · Cited by 3,826 · cited 1×
“78) (24-81) Missing 0 2 2 Sex Male 17 (33.”
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Self-citationA tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how
Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 · Cited by 3,384
Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111 · Cited by 3,203
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bombardier, 2012, Tate DG, et al.., An exploration of modifiable risk factors for depression after spinal cord injury: which factors should we target Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, 775
- Sheldon, 2006, How to increase and sustain positive emotion: the effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves., J Posit Psychol, 1, 73, 10.1080/17439760500510676 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing
van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Bartholomaeus, J., Kopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w · Cited by 510
Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers‐Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2 · Cited by 397
Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., de Jong, J. T. V. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2019) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00082-1 · Cited by 380
Schütze, R., Rees, C., Smith, A., Slater, H., Campbell, J. M., & O'Sullivan, P. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.010 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, R., Gertz, K. J., Molton, I. R., Terrill, A. L., Bombardier, C. H., Ehde, D. M., & Jensen, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Müller, Rachel
- Gertz, Kevin J.
- Molton, Ivan R.
- Terrill, Alexandra L.
- Bombardier, Charles H.
- Ehde, Dawn M.
- Jensen, Mark P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-44
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332959124
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 37.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- positive psychology interventions, chronic pain, physical disability, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, post-polio syndrome, computer-based intervention, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, pain management, life satisfaction, depression, positive affect, well-being, feasibility and acceptability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Computers, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Single-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review