Cited by 76Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Accepting Low Back Pain: Is It Related to a Good Quality of Life?

Mason, Victoria L., Mathias, Beth, Skevington, Suzanne M.·2008·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Whether individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are willing to accept their pain, is of interest to pain management, but how far is the acceptance of pain related to a good quality of life (QoL)? Recently available measures now enable this question to be investigated; these are (1) the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and a revised version, here described as a short-form (SF-CPAQ), and (2) the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL)-Pain, which is composed of the generic WHOQOL-100 profile (25 facets in 6 domains), and 4 additional facets within a specific pain and discomfort module (PDM). METHOD: Eighty-six CLBP outpatients (62.8% female, mean age 54.3 y, mean pain duration 69.4 mo) completed the CPAQ and WHOQOL-Pain, mailed 2 weeks before a pain clinic appointment. RESULTS: General QoL was positively associated with overall acceptance of pain (CPAQ: r=0.376, P=0.003; SF-CPAQ: r=0.582, P<0.001), and with activity engagement (r=0.455, P<0.001) and pain willingness (r=0.493, P<0.001) specifically. Lower reports of pain were also associated with a better QoL (r=-0.349, P=0.002). Pain level was important in explaining QoL relating to the physical and social domains and pain-related facets assessed by the PDM. Overall, acceptance contributed to explain QoL in the level of independence and environment domains and for pain-related QoL assessed by the PDM. However, pain and acceptance only made a modest contribution to explaining psychologic and social dimensions of QoL. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that present pain level and whether or not pain is accepted play an important role in the QoL of patients with chronic pain. Additionally, the results provide construct validity for the WHOQOL-Pain and SF-CPAQ measures, especially dimensions of pain willingness and activities engagement. The findings have implications for the way health care is delivered, particularly for the role of acceptance-based treatments for individuals with CLBP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e318156d94f

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, V. L., Mathias, B., & Skevington, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2008-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
22-29
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036450588
Cited by
76
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic low back pain, pain acceptance, quality of life, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, activity engagement, pain intensity, construct validity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review