The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment Expectancy and Credibility Are Associated With the Outcome of Both Physical and Cognitive-behavioral Treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients' initial beliefs about the success of a given pain treatment are shown to affect final treatment outcome. The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) has recently been developed as measure of treatment credibility and expectancy. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the factor structure of the CEQ in a sample of chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients by means of a confirmatory factor analysis, (2) to examine the association between treatment credibility and expectancy and patient characteristics, and (3) to assess whether treatment expectancy and credibility are associated with the outcome of rehabilitation treatment. METHODS: CLBP patients (n=167) were randomized to either active physical therapy (n=51), cognitive-behavioral therapy (n=57), or a combination therapy (n=59), and completed the CEQ after a careful explanation of the treatment rationale. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 2-factor structure (credibility/expectancy) of the CEQ. Lower credibility was associated with higher pain-related fear and lower internal control of pain, and lower expectancy with higher levels of pain-related fear and no radiating pain. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that after controlling for age, sex, treatment center, pain-intensity at baseline, duration of disability, and irrespective of the treatment offered, expectancy was significantly associated with disability and satisfaction. Credibility was significantly associated with patient-specific symptoms and satisfaction. For global perceived effect, treatment expectancy was predictive in active physical therapy only, and treatment credibility was a significant predictor in combination therapy only. DISCUSSION: Although the associations found were low to modest, these results underscore the importance of expectancy and credibility for the outcome of different active interventions for CLBP and might contribute to the development of more effective treatments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Though one might expect a self-directed intervention to have lower credibility or expectancy scores than other modalities [38], scores observed were similar to those seen for in-person ACT-based and CBT-based interventions [39, 40].”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy adapted for women with infertility: a pilot study of the Infertility ACTion program. (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685
A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395
Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Kole-Snijders, A. M. J., Boeren, R. G. B., & van Eek, H. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-n · Cited by 2,446
Self-citationPsychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Devilly, G. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4 · Cited by 2,295 · cited 2×
“expectancy is likely to be a stronger predictor of treatment outcome than treatment credibility.(7,13,16) However, this assumption is solely based on the study of Devilly and Borkovec(13) in patients with anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorders being treated with CBT.”
BackgroundAssessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale
Carlsson, A. M. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-x · Cited by 1,864
Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness
Fordyce, W. E. (1977) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(77)90029-x · Cited by 1,630
Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00255-3 · Cited by 1,597
Credibility of analogue therapy rationales
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6 · Cited by 1,553
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gommans, 1997, Validiteit en responsiviteit Nederlandstalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Vragenlijst naar functionele status bij patiënten met lage rugpijn, Ned T Fysiother, 107, 28
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Therapeutic Alliance Between Clinicians and Patients Predicts Outcome in Chronic Low Back Pain
Ferreira, P. H., Ferreira, M. L., Maher, C. G., Refshauge, K. M., Latimer, J., & Adams, R. D. (2012) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20120137 · Cited by 402
Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., van Breukelen, G. J. P., de Jong, J. R., Heuts, P. H. T. G., Smeets, R. J. E. M., Köke, A. J. A., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.009 · Cited by 393
Self-citationConstantino, M. J., Arnkoff, D. B., Glass, C. R., Ametrano, R. M., & Smith, J. Z. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20754 · Cited by 367
Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Williams, C. M., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., McLachlan, A. J., Hancock, M. J., Day, R. O., & Lin, C.-W. C. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60805-9 · Cited by 325
Constantino, M. J., Vîslă, A., Coyne, A. E., & Boswell, J. F. (2018) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000169 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Smeets, R. J. E. M., Beelen, S., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Schouten, E. G. W., Knottnerus, J. A., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Smeets, Rob J. E. M.
- Beelen, Saskia
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-315
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078292628
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, treatment expectancy, treatment credibility, factor structure, physiotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, combination therapy, fear of pain, disability, patient satisfaction, radiating pain, rehabilitation outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Patient Compliance, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
