Cited by 213Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Treatment Expectancy Affects the Outcome of Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions in Chronic Pain

Goossens, Mari??lle E. J. B., Vlaeyen, Johan W. S., Hidding, Alita, Kole-Snijders, Ank, Evers, Silvia M. A. A.·2005·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Patients' initial beliefs about the success of a given pain treatment are shown to have an important influence on the final treatment outcome. The aims of the paper are to assess determinants of patients' treatment expectancy and to examine the extent to which treatment expectancy predicts the short-term and long-term outcome of cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronic pain. This study employs the data of 2 pooled randomized clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral interventions for 171 patients with fibromyalgia and chronic low back pain. Pretreatment and posttreatment expectancy were measured by a short questionnaire, which was based on the procedure by Borkovec and Nau. Four composite outcome variables (pain coping and control, motoric behavior, negative affect, and quality of life) were measured before and after the intervention and at 12 months follow-up. Furthermore, several patient characteristics were taken into account. Patients with higher treatment expectancies significantly received less disability compensation and were less fearful. A regression model of 3 factors (better pain coping and control, active and positive interpretation of pain, and less disability compensation) significantly explained 10% of the variance in pretreatment expectancy. Pretreatment expectancy significantly predicted each of the 4 outcome measures immediately after treatment and at 12 months follow-up. This study corroborates the importance of treatment expectation before entering a cognitive-behavioral intervention in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goossens, M. E. J. B., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Hidding, A., Kole-Snijders, A., & Evers, S. M. A. A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049723989
Cited by
213
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
treatment expectancy, cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain, pain coping, pain management, disability compensation, fear-avoidance beliefs, quality of life, treatment outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attention, Chronic Disease, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review