Cited by 63Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsBiomedical and Chemical ResearchVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nuclear Spin Attenuates the Anesthetic Potency of Xenon Isotopes in Mice: Implications for the Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Consciousness

Abstract

What We Already Know about This Topic: What This Article Tells Us That Is New: Background: Xenon is an elemental anesthetic with nine stable isotopes. Nuclear spin is a quantum property which may differ among isotopes. Xenon 131 (131 Xe) has nuclear spin of 3/2, xenon 129 (129 Xe) a nuclear spin of 1/2, and the other seven isotopes have no nuclear spin. This study was aimed to explore the effect of nuclear spin on xenon anesthetic potency. Methods: Eighty C57BL/6 male mice (7 weeks old) were randomly divided into four groups, xenon 132 (132 Xe), xenon 134 (134 Xe),131 Xe, and 129 Xe groups. Due to xenon’s low potency, loss of righting reflex ED50 for mice to xenon was determined with 0.50% isoflurane. Loss of righting reflex ED50 of isoflurane was also measured, and the loss of righting reflex ED50 values of the four xenon isotopes were then calculated. The exact polarizabilities of the isotopes were calculated. Results: Combined with 0.50% isoflurane, the loss of righting reflex ED50 values were 15 ± 4%, 16 ± 5%, 22 ± 5%, and 23 ± 7% for 132 Xe,134 Xe,131 Xe, and 129 Xe, respectively. For xenon alone, the loss of righting reflex ED50 values of 132 Xe,134 Xe,131 Xe, and 129 Xe were 70 ± 4%, 72 ± 5%, 99 ± 5%, and 105 ± 7%, respectively. Four isotopes had a same exact polarizability of 3.60 Å 3. Conclusions: Xenon isotopes with nuclear spin are less potent than those without, and polarizability cannot account for the difference. The lower anesthetic potency of 129 Xe may be the result of it participating in conscious processing and therefore partially antagonizing its own anesthetic potency. Nuclear spin is a quantum property, and our results are consistent with theories that implicate quantum mechanisms in consciousness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000002226

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Li, N., Lu, D., Yang, L., Tao, H., Xu, Y., Wang, C., Fu, L., Liu, H., Chummum, Y., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Shihai
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2018-08
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
271-277
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797030385
Cited by
63
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
xenon, xenon isotopes, nuclear spin, anesthetic potency, isoflurane, loss of righting reflex, ED50, polarizability, quantum consciousness
MeSH terms
Animals, Consciousness, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Isoflurane, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Xenon Isotopes, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Mice, Reflex, Righting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review