Cited by 259Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsBiofield Effects and BiophysicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Quantum cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain

Open access
Fisher, Matthew P.A.·2015·Annals of Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The optimal candidate for a neural qubit in the brain should have a nuclear spin of 1/2 to ensure long-lived coherence.

    “The optimal candidate for a neural qubit in our brain should have a nuclear spin of 12 to ensure long-lived coherence.”
  • Matthew Fisher has proposed that phosphorus can act as a neural qubit allowing quantum processing to occur in the brain, and that this quantumness is protected by Posner molecules, which bind phosphate ions with calcium ions; entangled Posner molecules then trigger non-local quantum correlations of neuron firing rates.

    “Promising research in this direction has been done by Matthew Fisher who has proposed that phosphorus can act as a neural qubit allowing quantum processing to occur in the brain, and that this quantumness is protected by so-called Posner molecules, which bind phosphate ions with calcium ions.”

    From The future of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [119]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 17 M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, 'Quantum Computation and Quantum Information,' Cambridge University Press (2010).
  2. 33 W. Boron and E. Boulpaep, 'Medical Physiology: a cellular and molecular approach (2 ed.),' Philadelphia: Saunders, (2012) .
  3. 34 E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwawrtz, T. M. Jessell, S. A. Sieegelbaum, and A. J. Hudspeth, 'Principles of Neuroscience,' McGraw Hill (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, M. P. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Matthew P.A.
Venue
Annals of Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
362
Pages
593-602
ISSN
0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1767140829
Cited by
259
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Physics (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-14-04230)
  • Caltech Institute of Quantum Information and Matter
  • NSF Physics Frontiers Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum cognition, quantum brain, nuclear spin, phosphorus-31, Posner molecules, quantum entanglement, quantum memory, pyrophosphate hydrolysis, calcium ions, vesicle endocytosis, neurotransmitter release

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review