Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring with Nexfin®

Martina, Jerson R., Westerhof, Berend E., van Goudoever, Jeroen, de Beaumont, Edouard M. F. H., Truijen, Jasper, Kim, Yu-Sok, Immink, Rogier V., Jöbsis, Dorothea A., Hollmann, Markus W., Lahpor, Jaap R., de Mol, Bas A. J. M., van Lieshout, Johannes J.·2012·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: If invasive measurement of arterial blood pressure is not warranted, finger cuff technology can provide continuous and noninvasive monitoring. Finger and radial artery pressures differ; Nexfin® (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) measures finger arterial pressure and uses physiologic reconstruction methodologies to obtain values comparable to invasive pressures. Methods: Intra-arterial pressure (IAP) and noninvasive Nexfin arterial pressure (NAP) were measured in cardiothoracic surgery patients, because invasive pressures are available. NAP-IAP differences were analyzed during 30 min. Tracking was quantified by within-subject precision (SD of individual NAP-IAP differences) and correlation coefficients. The ranges of pressure change were quantified by within-subject variability (SD of individual averages of NAP and IAP). Accuracy and precision were expressed as group average ± SD of the differences and considered acceptable when smaller than 5 ± 8 mmHg, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria. Results: NAP and IAP were obtained in 50 (34-83 yr, 40 men) patients. For systolic, diastolic, mean arterial, and pulse pressure, median (25-75 percentiles) correlation coefficients were 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 0.93 (0.87-0.96), 0.96 (0.90-0.97), and 0.94 (0.85-0.98), respectively. Within-subject precisions were 4 ± 2, 3 ± 1, 3 ± 2, and 3 ± 2 mmHg, and within-subject variations 13 ± 6, 6 ± 3, 9 ± 4, and 7 ± 4 mmHg, indicating precision over a wide range of pressures. Group average ± SD of the NAP-IAP differences were -1 ± 7, 3 ± 6, 2 ± 6, and -3 ± 4 mmHg, meeting criteria. Differences were not related to mean arterial pressure or heart rate. Conclusion: Arterial blood pressure can be measured noninvasively and continuously using physiologic pressure reconstruction. Changes in pressure can be followed and values are comparable to invasive monitoring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e31824f94ed

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Martina, J. R., Westerhof, B. E., van Goudoever, J., de Beaumont, E. M. F. H., Truijen, J., Kim, Y.-S., Immink, R. V., Jöbsis, D. A., Hollmann, M. W., Lahpor, J. R., de Mol, B. A. J. M., & van Lieshout, J. J.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
1092-1103
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028141385
Cited by
292
References
5
FWCI
24.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring with Nexfin®. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e31824f94ed
The paper
Martina, J. R., Westerhof, B. E., van Goudoever, J., de Beaumont, E. M. F. H., Truijen, J., Kim, Y.-S., Immink, R. V., Jöbsis, D. A., Hollmann, M. W., Lahpor, J. R., de Mol, B. A. J. M., & van Lieshout, J. J. (2012). Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring with Nexfin®. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31824f94ed

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.