Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who Is at Risk for Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting after Ambulatory Surgery?

Open access
Apfel, Christian C., Philip, Beverly K., Cakmakkaya, Ozlem S., Shilling, Ashley, Shi, Yun-Ying, Leslie, John B., Allard, Martin, Turan, Alparslan, Windle, Pamela, Odom-Forren, Jan, Hooper, Vallire D., Radke, Oliver C., Ruiz, Joseph, Kovac, Anthony·2012·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: About one in four patients suffers from postoperative nausea and vomiting. Fortunately, risk scores have been developed to better manage this outcome in hospitalized patients, but there is currently no risk score for postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) in ambulatory surgical patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 2,170 adults undergoing general anesthesia at ambulatory surgery centers in the United States from 2007 to 2008. PDNV was assessed from discharge until the end of the second postoperative day. Logistic regression analysis was applied to a development dataset and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated in a validation dataset. Results: The overall incidence of PDNV was 37%. Logistic regression analysis of the development dataset (n=1,913) identified five independent predictors (odds ratio; 95% CI): female gender (1.54; 1.22 to 1.94), age less than 50 yr (2.17; 1.75 to 2.69), history of nausea and/or vomiting after previous anesthesia (1.50; 1.19 to 1.88), opioid administration in the postanesthesia care unit (1.93; 1.53 to 2.43), and nausea in the postanesthesia care unit (3.14; 2.44-4.04). In the validation dataset (n=257), zero, one, two, three, four, and five of these factors were associated with a PDNV incidence of 7%, 20%, 28%, 53%, 60%, and 89%, respectively, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (0.69 to 0.73). Conclusions: PDNV affects a substantial number of patients after ambulatory surgery. We developed and validated a simplified risk score to identify patients who would benefit from long-acting prophylactic antiemetics at discharge from the ambulatory care center.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e318267ef31

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Apfel, C. C., Philip, B. K., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Shilling, A., Shi, Y.-Y., Leslie, J. B., Allard, M., Turan, A., Windle, P., Odom-Forren, J., Hooper, V. D., Radke, O. C., Ruiz, J., & Kovac, A.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
475-486
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153833307
Cited by
334
References
27
FWCI
23.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Is at Risk for Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting after Ambulatory Surgery? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e318267ef31
The paper
Apfel, C. C., Philip, B. K., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Shilling, A., Shi, Y.-Y., Leslie, J. B., Allard, M., Turan, A., Windle, P., Odom-Forren, J., Hooper, V. D., Radke, O. C., Ruiz, J., & Kovac, A. (2012). Who Is at Risk for Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting after Ambulatory Surgery? Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e318267ef31

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.