The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Postoperative Interview: Assessing Risk Factors for Nausea and Vomiting
Abstract
Most studies of postoperative nausea and vomiting have concentrated on single etiologic factors and have not detailed the method of assessing these symptoms. This study used postoperative interview data from patients at four teaching hospitals during 1988-89, to determine 1) risk factors for nausea/vomiting, 2) whether the type of surgery affected the rate of nausea/vomiting among female patients, 3) whether differences in rates across hospitals were due to differences in patient case-mix, and 4) whether there were differences in the rate of nausea/vomiting among the patients of individual anesthesiologists. Research nurses performed 16,000 interviews (59% of all inpatients) from a closed-question standardized format. With a multiple logistic regression that controlled simultaneously for all risk factors, factors associated with increased risk for nausea/vomiting for all patients included younger age, female, lower physical status score, no preoperative medical conditions, nonsmokers, elective procedures, longer duration of anesthesia, inhaled anesthetics, use of intraoperative opioids, and gynecologic or ophthalmologic operations. Among women, risk factors were similar, with minor gynecologic surgery associated with increased risk (relative odds = 2.30). We found marked variations in the rate of nausea/vomiting across hospitals (range, 39% to 73%), and these variations were not explained by the case-mix of patients. The rate of nausea/vomiting varied substantially across anesthesiologists in each hospital and the differences were not explained by differences in the patients they managed. Thus in the time period immediately preceding the introduction of newer antiemetic drugs, we found that the rates of this common problem were persistently high as perceived from the patients' point of view.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Apfel, C. C., Läärä, E., Koivuranta, M., Greim, C.-A., & Roewer, N. (1999) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022 · Cited by 2,121
Consensus Guidelines for Managing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Gan, T. J., Meyer, T., Apfel, C. C., Chung, F., Davis, P. J., Eubanks, S., Kovac, A., Philip, B. K., Sessler, D. I., Temo, J., et al. (2003) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000068580.00245.95 · Cited by 965
Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Gan, T. J. (2006) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000219597.16143.4d · Cited by 666
Who Is at Risk for Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting after Ambulatory Surgery?
Apfel, C. C., Philip, B. K., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Shilling, A., Shi, Y.-Y., Leslie, J. B., Allard, M., Turan, A., Windle, P., Odom-Forren, J., et al. (2012) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318267ef31 · Cited by 334
A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults
Apfel, C. C., Greim, C. A., Haubitz, I., Goepfert, C., Usadel, J., Sefrin, P., & Roewer, N. (1998) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05157.x · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, M. M., Duncan, P. G., DeBoer, D. P., & Tweed, W. A.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7???16
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999179893
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Postoperative Interview: Assessing Risk Factors for Nausea and Vomiting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/00000539-199401000-00004
- The paper
- Cohen, M. M., Duncan, P. G., DeBoer, D. P., & Tweed, W. A. (1994). The Postoperative Interview: Assessing Risk Factors for Nausea and Vomiting. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199401000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.