Cited by 90Anesthesia and Pain ManagementCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponsePain Management and Opioid Use

A Double-blind Randomized Trial of Wound and Intercostal Space Infiltration with Ropivacaine during Breast Cancer Surgery: Effects on Chronic Postoperative Pain

Open access
Albi-Feldzer, Aline, Mouret-Fourme E, Emmanuelle, Hamouda, Smail, Motamed, Cyrus, Dubois, Pierre-Yves, Jouanneau, Ludivine, Jayr, Christian·2013·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of local anesthetic wound infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic postoperative pain is controversial and there are no detailed studies. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of ropivacaine wound infiltration on chronic pain after breast surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 236 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive ropivacaine or placebo infiltration of the wound, the second and third intercostal spaces and the humeral insertion of major pectoralis. Acute pain, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting were assessed every 30 min for 2 h in the postanesthesia care unit and every 6 h for 48 h. Chronic pain was evaluated 3 months, 6 months, and 1 yr after surgery by the brief pain inventory, hospital anxiety and depression, and neuropathic pain questionnaires. Results: Ropivacaine wound infiltration significantly decreased immediate postoperative pain for the first 90 min, but did not decrease chronic pain at 3 months (primary endpoint), or at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months, the incidence of chronic pain was 33% and 27% ( P = 0.37) in the ropivacaine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up, brief pain inventory, neuropathic pain, and anxiety increased over time in both groups ( P < 0.001) while depression remained stable. No complications occurred. Conclusion: This multicenter, prospective study shows that ropivacaine wound infiltration after breast cancer surgery decreased immediate postoperative pain but did not decrease chronic pain at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e31827d88d8

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results for regional anesthesia in preventing chronic pain are less consistent than for preventing acute pain.

    “Unfortunately, the results are not as consistent for the prevention of chronic pain as they are for the prevention of acute pain [24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wilder-Smith OH, Arendt-Nielsen L: Postoperative hyperal- gesia: Its clinical importance and relevance. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:601-7
  2. Thavaneswaran P, Rudkin GE, Cooter RD, Moyes DG, Perera CL, Maddern GJ: Brief reports: Paravertebral block for anes- thesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:1740-4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albi-Feldzer, A., Mouret-Fourme E, E., Hamouda, S., Motamed, C., Dubois, P.-Y., Jouanneau, L., & Jayr, C.
Affiliations
  • Institut Jean Godinot (FR)
  • Professional Staff, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Hôpital René Huguenin (FR)
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
Corresponding author
Jayr, Christian
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2013-02
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
318-326
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986604727
Cited by
90
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
ropivacaine, wound infiltration, breast cancer surgery, postoperative pain, chronic pain, neuropathic pain, local anesthetics, postoperative analgesia, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Ropivacaine, Aged, Amides, Analgesics, Opioid, Anesthesia, Local, Anesthetics, Local, Breast Neoplasms, Chronic Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Injections, Intercostal Muscles, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Complications, Sufentanil, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review