Cited by 12Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsInfant Development and Preterm Care

Provider Perceptions of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Barriers to Implementation in a Level III Neonatal Unit in South India

Atreya, Mihir R., Lorenz, John M., Narendran, Vivek·2018·Advances in Neonatal Care

Abstract

Background: Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a simple, safe, and cost-effective strategy to provide respiratory support to newborns with respiratory distress syndrome in resource-limited settings. Purpose: To understand whether implementation of bCPAP, relative to other modes of respiratory support in the care of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome, increases positive attitudes about its potential for consistent and widespread use among providers in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of lower middle-income countries. Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews with 14 healthcare providers, including 5 neonatal nurses, 2 respiratory therapists, 5 postgraduate trainees in pediatrics, and 2 attending physicians, were conducted at a level III NICU in south India where bCPAP had been in consistent use for 6 years. Interviews were transcribed and then coded and categorized using NVivo 10 Software (QSR International, Victoria, Australia). Findings: Categories that emerged from our data include (1) perceived indications, (2) learning curve, (3) perceived costs, (4) perceived shortages, and (5) barriers to use. Providers believed that bCPAP was easy to learn and that it helped empower neonatal nurses in decision-making process. Participants provided a nuanced perspective of cost-benefit associated with bCPAP and that it helped make optimal use of limited resources. Participants identified several barriers to the implementation of bCPAP. Implications for Practice: Providers of a level III NICU in a lower- to middle-income country viewed the use of bCPAP favorably. Addressing context-specific barriers will be important for the successful widespread implementation of bCPAP. Implications for Research: Further research will need to focus on whether bCPAP can be safely implemented at level II NICUs. Video Abstract Available at https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx?videoId=30&autoPlay=true.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/anc.0000000000000510

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atreya, M. R., Lorenz, J. M., & Narendran, V.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Atreya, Mihir R.
Venue
Advances in Neonatal Care
Published
2018-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
500-506
ISSN
1536-0903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805869658
Cited by
12
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Neonatal Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
bubble continuous positive airway pressure, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, provider perceptions, implementation barriers, neonatal intensive care, resource-limited settings, learning curve, cost-benefit analysis, neonatal nurses, respiratory support
MeSH terms
Pediatricians, Nurses, Neonatal, Implementation Science, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, India, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiratory Therapy, Qualitative Research, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review