The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review of the Literature: Parental Outcomes After Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly
Abstract
Advancing technology has made detecting fetal abnormalities in the first and second trimesters a reality. Few families are prepared for the difficult decisions that must be made if their unborn children are diagnosed with a life-limiting condition. Expectant parents are compelled to make decisions on the basis of limited options. A systematic review of the literature is presented with an aim to inform clinicians of parental experiences and outcomes after diagnosis of a fetal anomaly. The review focused on patients given a diagnosis for fetal anomalies for the 40-year period from 1970 to 2010 by using the key words such as fetal anomaly, congenital malformations, pregnancy termination, perinatal palliative care, and perinatal hospice. Regardless of the option taken, women often experienced intense grief reactions. Both giving birth to a child with a life-limiting condition and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly can be emotionally traumatic life events, both associated with psychological morbidity. Nonaggressive obstetric management, allowing natural birth without life-sustaining therapeutics, is an option for families. Couples presented with a coordinated perinatal palliative care model may opt to continue their pregnancy. Families who experienced perinatal hospice/palliative care report positive feedback, but more research is needed to explore the psychological outcomes of this choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Korenromp, M. J., Page-Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Bilardo, C. M., Offermans, J. P. M., & Visser, G. H. A. (2005) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1307 · Cited by 56
Cited by
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 · Cited by 5,505
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary
Nolan, J. P., Soar, J., Zideman, D. A., Biarent, D., Bossaert, L. L., Deakin, C., Koster, R. W., Wyllie, J., & Böttiger, B. (2010) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021 · Cited by 1,375
Ehde, D. M., Dillworth, T. M., & Turner, J. A. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035747 · Cited by 879
p38MAPK: stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics
Coulthard, L. R., White, D. E., Jones, D. L., McDermott, M. F., & Burchill, S. A. (2009) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.005 · Cited by 691
The incidence and prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity
McLeod, D. S. A., & Cooper, D. S. (2012) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-012-9703-2 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Wool, C.
- Venue
- Advances in Neonatal Care
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 182-192
- ISSN
- 1536-0903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328600756
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review of the Literature: Parental Outcomes After Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/anc.0b013e31821bd92d
- The paper
- Wool, C. (2011). Systematic Review of the Literature: Parental Outcomes After Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly. Advances in Neonatal Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0b013e31821bd92d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.