Cited by 52Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

A Theory-Based Primary Health Care Intervention for Women Who Have Left Abusive Partners

Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn, Merritt-Gray, Marilyn, Varcoe, Colleen, Wuest, Judith·2011·Advances in Nursing Science

Abstract

Although intimate partner violence is a significant global health problem, few tested interventions have been designed to improve women's health and quality of life, particularly beyond the crisis of leaving. The Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving is a comprehensive, trauma informed, primary health care intervention, which builds on the grounded theory Strengthening Capacity to Limit Intrusion and other research findings. Delivered by a nurse and a domestic violence advocate working collaboratively with women through 6 components (safeguarding, managing basics, managing symptoms, cautious connecting, renewing self, and regenerating family), this promising intervention is in the early phases of testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ans.0b013e3182228cdc

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Survivors experience adverse physical health consequences relating to both physical injury and somatization of stress, including traumatic brain injury, chronic pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, reproductive health, neuroendocrine alterations, and epigenetic changes.

    “Survivors experience adverse physical health consequences relating to both physical injury and somatization of stress, including traumatic brain injury (Valera et al., 2021), chronic pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, reproductive health, neuroendocrine alterations and epigenetic changes (Ford-Gilboe et al., 2011; Ford-Gilboe et al., 2015).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Ford-Gilboe et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., Varcoe, C., & Wuest, J.
Affiliations
University of New Brunswick (CA)
Venue
Advances in Nursing Science
Published
2011-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
198-214
ISSN
0161-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043629677
Cited by
52
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, leaving abusive relationships, women's health, primary health care intervention, trauma-informed care, symptom management, family reintegration, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, New Brunswick, Ontario, Primary Health Care, Sexual Partners, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Women's Health, Battered Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review