Cited by 93Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsReproductive Health and Contraception

Association of venous thromboembolism with hormonal contraception and thrombophilic genotypes

Bergendal, Annica, Persson, Ingemar, Odeberg, Jacob, Sundström, Anders, Holmström, Margareta, Schulman, Sam, Björgell, Ola, Kieler, Helle·2014·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between combined hormonal contraception and progestogen-only contraception and risks of venous thromboembolism by progestogen and carriership of genetic hemostatic variations. METHODS: This was a case-control study in Sweden carried out between 2003 and 2009, which included 948 patients with venous thromboembolism and 902 individuals in a control group, all aged 18-54 years. Information was obtained by telephone interviews and DNA analyses of blood samples. Radiologic referrals were used for case ascertainment. For comparisons, odds ratios were estimated by unconditional logistic regression analysis adjusting for smoking, body mass index (BMI), and immobilization. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) for current use of combined hormonal contraception was 5.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-7.0). Desogestrel combinations had the highest OR (11.4, 95% CI 6.0-22.0). The OR for injection of medroxyprogesterone acetate was 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-4.0). In users of combined hormonal contraception with the factor V Leiden mutation, the OR was 20.6 (95% CI 8.9-58). In women who used progestogen-only contraception and carried the factor V Leiden mutation, the OR was 5.4 (95% CI 2.5-13). CONCLUSION: Risks of venous thromboembolism in association with combined hormonal contraception vary by type of progestogen and independently of BMI and smoking. Thrombophilic genotypes such as factor V Leiden increase risks of venous thromboembolism in users of combined hormonal contraception. Except for injection of medroxyprogesterone acetate, progestin-only contraception seems to be the least thrombogenic hormonal contraception for women carrying genetic hemostatic variations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000000411

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHC has been shown to increase the risk of thrombosis.

    “In patients with high risk of thrombosis who are not fully anticoagulated, CHC and injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) should be avoided, and is generally contraindicated, as both have been shown to increase the risk of thrombosis[104, 105].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Injectable progesterone such as DMPA may have a small increase in VTE risk.

    “Progestin-only pills are generally considered safe, however, injectable progesterone such as DMPA may have a small increase in VTE risk [104, 105].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has been shown to increase the risk of thrombosis.

    “In patients with high risk of thrombosis who are not fully anticoagulated, CHC and injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) should be avoided, and is generally contraindicated, as both have been shown to increase the risk of thrombosis[104, 105].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

  • Progestin-only pills are generally considered safe in women with hereditary thrombophilia.

    “Progestin-only pills are generally considered safe, however, injectable progesterone such as DMPA may have a small increase in VTE risk [104, 105].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergendal, A., Persson, I., Odeberg, J., Sundström, A., Holmström, M., Schulman, S., Björgell, O., & Kieler, H.
Affiliations
Medical Products Agency (SE)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2014-09
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
600-609
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052123395
Cited by
93
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
venous thromboembolism, hormonal contraception, combined hormonal contraceptives, progestin-only contraception, desogestrel, medroxyprogesterone acetate, factor V Leiden, thrombophilia, thrombogenic risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraception, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Factor V, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Progestins, Risk Factors, Smoking, Sweden, Body Mass Index, Desogestrel, Point Mutation, Risk Assessment, Thrombophilia, Venous Thromboembolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review