Cited by 102Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and the Risk of Congenital Malformations

Open access
Bateman, Brian T., Patorno, Elisabetta, Desai, Rishi J., Seely, Ellen W., Mogun, Helen, Dejene, Sara Z., Fischer, Michael A., Friedman, Alexander M. +2 more·2017·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between first-trimester angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor exposure and the risk of overall major congenital, cardiac, and central nervous system malformations. METHODS: We used a cohort of completed pregnancies linked to liveborn neonates derived from Medicaid claims from 2000 to 2010. We examined the risk of malformations associated with first-trimester exposure to an ACE inhibitor. Propensity score-based methods were used to control for potential confounders including maternal demographics, medical conditions, exposure to other medications, and measures of health care utilization. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,333,624 pregnancies, of which 4,107 (0.31%) were exposed to ACE inhibitors during the first trimester. The prevalence of overall malformations in the ACE inhibitor-exposed pregnancies was 5.9% compared with 3.3% in the unexposed (unadjusted relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-2.06), of cardiac malformations was 3.4% compared with 1.2% (relative risk 2.95, 95% CI 2.50-3.47), and of central nervous system malformations was 0.27% compared with 0.18% (relative risk 1.46, 95% CI 0.81-2.64). After restricting the cohort to pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension (both exposed and unexposed) and accounting for other confounding factors, there was no significant increase in the risk of any of the outcomes assessed. Relative risks associated with first-trimester ACE inhibitor exposure were 0.89 (95% CI 0.75-1.06) for overall malformations, 0.95 (95% CI 0.75-1.21) for cardiac malformations, and 0.54 (95% CI 0.26-1.11) for CNS malformations. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for confounders, among women with hypertension, exposure to ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000001775

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large study found that after adjusting for confounders, first trimester ACE inhibitor exposure does not appear to be associated with congenital malformations.

    “A large study found that after adjusting for confounders, first trimester ACE inhibitor exposure does not appear to be associated with congenital malformations (128).”
  • The association with exposure during the first trimester is less consistent.

    “The association with exposure during the fi rst trimester, however, is less consistent.”
  • Other studies did not demonstrate an association with ACEi use in the first trimester after adjusting for underlying disease characteristics, particularly first-trimester hypertension.

    “there were other studies that did not demonstrate such an association with ACEi use in the fi rst trimester, after adjusting for underlying disease characteristics, particularly fi rst-trimester hypertension. 68”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bateman, B. T., Patorno, E., Desai, R. J., Seely, E. W., Mogun, H., Dejene, S. Z., Fischer, M. A., Friedman, A. M., Hernandez-Diaz, S., & Huybrechts, K. F.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2017-01
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
174-184
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560010172
Cited by
102
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL096141)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100216, K01MH099141)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K08HD075831)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
ACE inhibitors, congenital malformations, first trimester drug exposure, cardiac anomalies, central nervous system malformations, maternal hypertension, prenatal drug exposure
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adult, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Central Nervous System, Chronic Disease, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Hypertension, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review