Cited by 22Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsReproductive Health and ContraceptionDermatologic Treatments and Research

Influence of contraception class on incidence and severity of acne vulgaris

Open access
Barbieri, John S., Mitra, Nandita, Margolis, David J., Harper, Cynthia C., Mostaghimi, Arash, Abuabara, Katrina·2020·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of different contraceptive methods on the incidence and severity of acne. METHODS: Using a de-identified commercial claims database, we performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the incidence of clinical encounters for acne in the first year after initiation of contraception among female patients aged 12–40 years who were new contraceptive users. To evaluate the association of contraception class with acne severity, a subgroup analysis was performed among a cohort of patients with a history of acne examining the incidence of treatment escalation from topical acne medications to an oral tetracycline-class antibiotic in the year after initiation of contraception. RESULTS: Among new contraceptive users with no history of acne (N=336,738), compared with combined oral contraceptives (OCs), the copper intrauterine device (IUD) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 1.01–1.29) and levonorgestrel IUDs (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.03–1.16) were associated with increased risk of clinical encounters with acne. Among those with a history of acne (n=21,178), compared with combined OCs, the copper IUD (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.00–2.06) and levonorgestrel IUDs (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.10–1.64) were associated with increased risk of treatment escalation from topical acne medications to an oral tetracycline class antibiotic. CONCLUSION: Combined OCs appear to be associated with a modest (or small) protective effect with respect to incident acne and treatment escalation compared with other contraceptive methods. However, absolute differences between contraceptive methods were small.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000003880

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progestin-only contraceptive pills, intramuscular injections, intrauterine devices, or subcutaneous implants may worsen acne.

    “Progestin-only oral contraceptive pills, intramuscular injections, intrauterine devices, or subcutaneous implants may worsen acne.196,197”

    From Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris (2024) · cites this paper as [196]

    The Results report more acne encounters after switching from combined pills to progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel IUDs, or an etonogestrel implant. The Introduction also reports a prior survey suggesting that injections, implants, and hormonal IUDs worsened acne. However, this paper's new-user analysis found fewer incident acne encounters with DMPA injections and implants, and switching to DMPA was not associated with a significant increase; the blanket claim is therefore not supported by its findings for every listed method. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]van Vloten WA, van Haselen CW, van Zuuren EJ, Gerlinger C, Heithecker R. The effect of 2 combined oral Contraceptives containing either drospirenone or cyproterone acetate on acne and seborrhea. Cutis. 2002; 69(4 Suppl): 2– 15. 12096825

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbieri, J. S., Mitra, N., Margolis, D. J., Harper, C. C., Mostaghimi, A., & Abuabara, K.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2020-06
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1306-1312
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021572880
Cited by
22
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR069589, T32AR007465)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
acne, contraception, combined oral contraceptives, copper intrauterine device, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, acne severity, tetracycline antibiotics, female patients
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Contraception, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Female, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Copper, Intrauterine Devices, Medicated, Retrospective Studies, United States, Incidence, Databases, Factual, Levonorgestrel, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review