Cited by 14Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Risk factors for surgical failure and worsening pelvic floor symptoms within 5 years after vaginal prolapse repair

Open access
Jakus-Waldman, Sharon, Brubaker, Linda, Jelovsek, John Eric, Schaffer, Joseph I., Ellington, David R., Mazloomdoost, Donna, Whitworth, Ryan, Gantz, Marie G. +1 more·2020·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess independent risk factors for surgical failure and worsening pelvic floor symptoms within 5 years after vaginal prolapse surgery. METHODS: This secondary analysis includes OPTIMAL (Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss) (n=374) and E-OPTIMAL (Extended) (n=285) trial participants. Surgical failure was defined as apical descent greater than one third of the total vaginal length, anterior or posterior vaginal wall past the hymen, subsequent surgery or bothersome vaginal bulge. Worsening pelvic floor symptoms were defined as increases from baseline as large as the minimally important difference for subscale scores of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: 11 for the Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory and 34.3 for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory. Outcomes were measured at 6 months then 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Chi-square and t test results from bivariate models and clinical relevance were used to inform final models. RESULTS: Baseline risk factors for surgical failure were Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.17–3.15), perineal body (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09–1.63), and pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05–1.28). Risk factors for worsening of pelvic floor symptoms were pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60–0.94) for worsening Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score, vaginal deliveries (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10–1.44) and pretreatment Urinary Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80–0.93) for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory score, and age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05) and pretreatment Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98) for worsening Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic ethnicity, larger preoperative perineal body, and higher pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores were risk factors for surgical failure up to 5 years after vaginal prolapse repair. Participants with higher baseline Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores were less likely to worsen. Risk factors for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory scores included more vaginal deliveries and increased age, respectively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00597935, NCT01166373.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000004092

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]DeLancey JO, Morley GW, Howard D. Sacrospinous suspension. Obstet Gynecol Manage 2001; 13: 18– 29.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jakus-Waldman, S., Brubaker, L., Jelovsek, J. E., Schaffer, J. I., Ellington, D. R., Mazloomdoost, D., Whitworth, R., Gantz, M. G., & for the NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN)
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
136
Issue
5
Pages
933-941
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091803542
Cited by
14
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD041261, UG1HD041261, UG1HD069006, U10HD054214, U10HD069010, U10HD069006, U01HD069031, U10HD069013, U10HD041267, U10HD054241, UG1HD054214, UG1HD069010, UG1HD054241, U24HD069031, UG1HD041267, UG1HD069013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
vaginal prolapse repair, surgical failure, pelvic floor symptoms, risk factors, pelvic organ prolapse, Hispanic origin, perineal body, urinary symptoms, vaginal delivery, OPTIMAL trial, pelvic floor muscle training
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Fecal Incontinence, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Time Factors, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Vagina, Vaginal Diseases, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Failure, Disease Progression, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review