Cited by 62Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Patients With Puerperal Mastitis Requiring Hospitalization

Stafford, Irene, Hernandez, Jennifer, Laibl, Vanessa, Sheffield, Jeanne, Roberts, Scott, Wendel, George·2008·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective To estimate the incidence of puerperal mastitis requiring hospital admission and to describe demographic and obstetric risk factors for this condition. We also sought to identify trends in bacteriology among isolates obtained from breast abscesses and breast-milk aspirates, with a focus on treatment strategies used for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods Patients with puerperal mastitis who were admitted to a county-based teaching hospital between January 1997 and December 2005 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes (675.1, 675.2). Data collected included demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, duration of admission, premorbid antibiotic exposure, and bacteriology. Demographic variables and obstetric outcomes were compared with all other pregnant women delivered at our hospital. Results One hundred twenty-seven of 136,459 women delivered at our teaching hospital were admitted for puerperal mastitis (9.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-11.1] per 10,000 deliveries). The incidence of mastitis only during the study period was 6.7 (95% CI 5.4-8.3) per 10,000 deliveries, and the incidence of mastitis with breast abscess was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-3.6) per 10,000 deliveries. Puerperal mastitis was significantly associated with younger women (23.4 years compared with 25.1 years, P Conclusion Community-acquired MRSA was most commonly associated with breast abscess. The empi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e31818187b0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stafford, I., Hernandez, J., Laibl, V., Sheffield, J., Roberts, S., & Wendel, G.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2008-09
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
533-537
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056707855
Cited by
62
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
puerperal mastitis, community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, breast abscess, mastitis incidence, risk factors, parity, antibiotic therapy, empirical antibiotic therapy, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Abscess, Adult, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Mastitis, Puerperal Infection, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Texas, Incidence, Methicillin Resistance, Community-Acquired Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review