Cited by 26Breast Lesions and CarcinomasAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections May Not Impede the Success of Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Puerperal Breast Abscesses

Chen, Chin-Yau, Anderson, Benjamin O., Lo, Su-Shun, Lin, Chi-Hung, Chen, Huo-Mu·2010·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage has been suggested in recent years to be the treatment of choice for breast abscesses. Although MRSA has recently been observed to be a significant causative pathogen in mastitis, reports dealing with ultrasound-guided drainage of breast abscess did not address the bacteriology of these infections. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1 and December 31, 2007, 129 women were diagnosed with puerperal mastitis at Taipei City Hospital. Data were collected by retrospective chart review. Charts were surveyed for mastitis recurrence for at least 1 year after the initial infection treatment, through December 31, 2008. RESULTS: The most commonly identified organism was Staphylococcus aureus, present in 69 of 78 of bacterial isolates (88%). There were 52 of 78 (66%) bacterial isolates that were MRSA. Forty-seven of 52 (90%) women infected by MRSA underwent initial ultrasound-guided percutaneous abscess drainage. Among them, 11 (23%) women underwent subsequent conversion to surgical incision and drainage. Comparing women infected with MRSA and women infected with other pathogens, there was no statistical difference in the duration of treatment, number of outpatient follow-up visits, duration of antibiotics use, or abscess recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA is the most common bacteria in puerperal breast abscess in our population. When these patients are treated initially by percutaneous abscess drainage followed by repeated ultrasound-guided drainage or surgical incision and drainage, the presence of MRSA may not adversely affect treatment outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.11.003

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C.-Y., Anderson, B. O., Lo, S.-S., Lin, C.-H., & Chen, H.-M.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming University Hospital (TW)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
  • Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Huo-Mu
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2010-02
Volume
210
Issue
2
Pages
148-154
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062262112
Cited by
26
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, puerperal mastitis, breast abscess, ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage, incision and drainage, abscess recurrence, treatment outcomes, bacterial isolates
MeSH terms
Abscess, Adult, Drainage, Female, Humans, Mastitis, Puerperal Infection, Retrospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Cohort Studies, Ultrasonography, Mammary, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review