Cited by 125Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareBirth, Development, and Health

Weight Gain Recommendations in Pregnancy and the Obesity Epidemic

Artal, Raul, Lockwood, Charles J., Brown, Haywood L.·2010·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Excessive gestational weight gain and obesity have been recognized as independent risk factors for maternal and fetal complications of pregnancy with significant lifelong consequences. These associations call into question the recently released Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain recommendations, particularly for obese women. The IOM recommendation of a single standard of weight gain for all obesity classes is also of concern, because higher body mass index levels are associated with more severe pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes. The IOM recommendations retained the 1990 focus on the theoretical association between poor gestational weight gain and low birth weight (LBW). Low gestational weight gain may often be a consequence and not the cause of LBW, and there is a lack of evidence in developed countries that dietary supplementation increases birth weight. Current obstetric practice allows for accurate and timely diagnosis of and intervention for LBW. We submit that gestational weight gain recommendations should be more individualized especially for obese women. Obese pregnant women should not be precluded from partaking in healthy lifestyle modifications in pregnancy that include physical activities, modified, judicious diets, and limited weight gain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c51908

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower GWG in women with GDM is associated with reduced risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, caesarean section, and macrosomia without increasing small-for-gestational-age risks.

    “Lower GWG in women with GDM [44,45,46,47,48,49] is associated with reduced risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia [49,50,51], caesarean section [47], and macrosomia [43,49] without increasing small-for-gestational-age (SGA) risks [43,49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Artal, R., Lockwood, C. J., & Brown, H. L.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2010-01
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
152-155
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987701621
Cited by
125
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
gestational weight gain, maternal obesity, Institute of Medicine guidelines, low birth weight, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, exercise during pregnancy, lifestyle modification
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review