Cited by 33Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Relationship Between Excessive Gestational Weight Gain and Neonatal Adiposity in Women With Mild Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Blackwell, Sean C., Landon, Mark B., Mele, Lisa, Reddy, Uma M., Casey, Brian M., Wapner, Ronald J., Varner, Michael W., Rouse, Dwight J. +8 more·2016·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationships among excessive gestational weight gain, neonatal adiposity, and adverse obstetric outcomes in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus. Based on self-reported prepregnancy body weight, gestational weight gain was categorized as excessive if it was greater than 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines. Maternal outcomes and neonatal anthropomorphic characteristics were compared between women with excessive weight gain and those without excessive weight gain. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: We studied 841 women who participated in the main trial and had prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and delivery information available (n=431 treatment group, n=410 no treatment). After adjustment for factors including treatment and prepregnancy BMI, excessive weight gain remained associated with large for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81–4.93), birth weight greater than 4,000 g (adjusted OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.54–4.40), preeclampsia (adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.35–7.03), and cesarean delivery for labor arrest (adjusted OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.30–4.44). In addition, excessive weight gain was independently associated with increased total neonatal fat (P<.001) and birth weight (P<.001). CONCLUSION: In women with both treated and untreated mild gestational diabetes mellitus, excessive gestational weight gain was independently associated with both greater birth weight and adiposity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000001773

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Rasmussen KM Yaktine AL Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines 2009 Washington (DC 20669500

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackwell, S. C., Landon, M. B., Mele, L., Reddy, U. M., Casey, B. M., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., Sciscione, A., Catalano, P., Saade, G., Caritis, S. N., Sorokin, Y., Grobman, W. A., & for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2016-12
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
1325-1332
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555022744
Cited by
33
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000439)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR011234, M01RR000080, UL1RR024989, UL1RR025764, M01RR000034)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01HD036801, U10HD040544, U10HD034208, U10HD040512, UG1HD034116, UG1HD053097, U10HD027915, U10HD040545, U10HD040560, U10HD027917, U10HD036801, U10HD027860, U10HD021410, U10HD053097, U10HD034116, U10HD040500, U10HD040485, P2CHD050924, U10HD053118, U10HD027869, U10HD034136, UG1HD034208, U24HD036801, UG1HD040500, UG1HD040512, UG1HD027869, UG1HD040544, UG1HD040485, UG1HD027915, UG1HD040560, UG1HD040545)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational weight gain, excessive weight gain, gestational diabetes mellitus, neonatal adiposity, birth weight, large for gestational age, preeclampsia, cesarean section, adverse obstetric outcomes, pre-pregnancy body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obesity, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Adiposity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review