The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine physician-documented indications for cesarean delivery in order to investigate the specific factors contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. METHODS: We analyzed rates of primary and repeat cesarean delivery, including indications for the procedure, among 32,443 live births at a major academic hospital between 2003 and 2009. Time trends for each indication were modeled to estimate the absolute and cumulative annualized relative risk of cesarean by indication over time and the relative contribution of each indication to the overall increase in primary cesarean delivery rate. RESULTS: The cesarean delivery rate increased from 26% to 36.5% between 2003 and 2009; 50.0% of the increase was attributable to an increase in primary cesarean delivery. Among the documented indications, nonreassuring fetal status, arrest of dilation, multiple gestation, preeclampsia, suspected macrosomia, and maternal request increased over time, whereas arrest of descent, malpresentation, maternal-fetal indications, and other obstetric indications (eg, cord prolapse, placenta previa) did not increase. The relative contributions of each indication to the total increase in primary cesarean rate were: nonreassuring fetal status (32%), labor arrest disorders (18%), multiple gestation (16%), suspected macrosomia (10%), preeclampsia (10%), maternal request (8%), maternal-fetal conditions (5%), and other obstetric conditions (1%). CONCLUSION: Primary cesarean births accounted for 50% of the increasing cesarean rate. Among primary cesarean deliveries, more subjective indications (nonreassuring fetal status and arrest of dilation) contributed larger proportions than more objective indications (malpresentation, maternal-fetal, and obstetric conditions).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States
Reddy, U. M., Ko, C.-W., & Willinger, M. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.019 · Cited by 334
Cited by
Chu, D. M., Ma, J., Prince, A. L., Antony, K. M., Seferovic, M. D., & Aagaard, K. M. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4272 · Cited by 1,063
Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer
Dominguez-Bello, M. G., De Jesus-Laboy, K. M., Shen, N., Cox, L. M., Amir, A., Gonzalez, A., Bokulich, N. A., Song, S. J., Hoashi, M., Rivera-Vinas, J. I., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4039 · Cited by 1,014
Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?
Creanga, A. A., Berg, C. J., Ko, J. Y., Farr, S. L., Tong, V. T., Bruce, F. C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2014) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2013.4617 · Cited by 397
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound
Ghi, T., Eggebø, T., Lees, C., Kalache, K., Rozenberg, P., Youssef, A., Salomon, L. J., & Tutschek, B. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19072 · Cited by 348
Opioid Abuse and Dependence during Pregnancy: Temporal Trends and Obstetrical Outcomes
Maeda, A., Bateman, B. T., Clancy, C. R., Creanga, A. A., & Leffert, L. R. (2014) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000472 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Barber, E. L., Lundsberg, L. S., Belanger, K., Pettker, C. M., Funai, E. F., & Illuzzi, J. L.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-38
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2402783003
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0b013e31821e5f65
- The paper
- Barber, E. L., Lundsberg, L. S., Belanger, K., Pettker, C. M., Funai, E. F., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2011). Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31821e5f65
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.